The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
1992
DOI: 10.1016/0007-1935(92)90006-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparative effectiveness of three commercial oral solutions in correcting fluid, electrolyte and acid-base disturbances caused by calf diarrhoea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with other reports using a similar model (Leal et al, 2012). Electrolyte derange-ments in scouring calves can be variable and difficult to predict without individual analysis (Michell et al, 1992). Correction of hydration status and electrolyte loss and improving ECF volume are key components of a rehydration protocol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is consistent with other reports using a similar model (Leal et al, 2012). Electrolyte derange-ments in scouring calves can be variable and difficult to predict without individual analysis (Michell et al, 1992). Correction of hydration status and electrolyte loss and improving ECF volume are key components of a rehydration protocol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…40 An oral electrolyte solution with a high effective SID would also appear to be more appropriate to treat acidemic diarrheic calves. This recommendation is consistent with the results of 5 studies [41][42][43][44][45] indicating that administration of an oral electrolyte solution with a high effective SID (79-93 mEq/L) is more effective in correcting hyponatremia and metabolic acidosis than a solution of much lower effective SID (0-31 mEq/L).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Since sodium is the osmotic skeleton of the extracellular fluid, it must be present in adequate concentration in ORS. A study comparing three ORS with different sodium concentrations in calves found that the solution with a sodium content of 120 mmol/L corrected dehydration, whereas solutions with much lower concentrations did not [14]. Even though there is little evidence that solutions with sodium concentrations > 130 mmol/L are harmful, it is generally suggested that the sodium concentration for ORS should be between 90 and 130 mmol/L [15].…”
Section: Oral Rehydration Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%