I f consumers o f mental health services are to make informed deci sions about their own treatment, a structured approach to this complex decision-making task is essential A three-step approach, analogous to costbenefit analysis, is introduced to guide practitioners in actively engaging consumers in the treatment planning process. Separate estimates o f treat ment efficacy and restrictiveness lay the groundwork for the selection among treatment alternatives. Analysis o f restrictiveness into four compo nents-autonomy, interaction with "normals, " stigma, and duration-fur ther facilitates this task.