1989
DOI: 10.1037/h0099505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosthetic environments for high-risk adolescents: Toward a multi-dimensional model.

Abstract: The concept of prosthetic environments is proposed as a unifying concept for the design and implementation of adolescent mental health services. Sufficiently molar in clinical reach to guide program design and sufficiently molecular to stimulate effective treatment planning for individual patients, the notion of prosthesis is inclusive enough to simultaneously address the multidimensionality and dynamism of adolescent developmental needs while encompassing the systemic complexities of family, school, and commu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, proponents of the concept of prosthetic environment, neutrally defined as a milieu designed to compensate for individual biopsychosocial deficits, implicitly urge the application of the principle of least restrictiveness to select from among those potentially therapeutic environments the program setting that presents the highest level of normal life demands with which the patient can cope without endangering him- or herself or others (Byalin & Lieberman, 1989; Lieberman et al, 1985). Whether or not one adopts this terminology, it is clear that the needs of some patients cannot be met except in non-natural settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, proponents of the concept of prosthetic environment, neutrally defined as a milieu designed to compensate for individual biopsychosocial deficits, implicitly urge the application of the principle of least restrictiveness to select from among those potentially therapeutic environments the program setting that presents the highest level of normal life demands with which the patient can cope without endangering him- or herself or others (Byalin & Lieberman, 1989; Lieberman et al, 1985). Whether or not one adopts this terminology, it is clear that the needs of some patients cannot be met except in non-natural settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%