2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13148.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The community context of species’ borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives

Abstract: 2005. The community context of species' borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Á/ Oikos 108: 28 Á/46. Species distributional limits may coincide with hard dispersal barriers or physiological thresholds along environmental gradients, but they may also be influenced by species interactions. We explore a number of models of interspecific interactions that lead to (sometimes abrupt) distribution limits in the presence and absence of environmental gradients. We find that gradients in competitive ability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
376
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(384 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(141 reference statements)
6
376
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with other studies, our analysis showed that competition can reduce a species range (Case et al 2005), and that dispersal can cause species distributions to differ from fundamental niche space due to immigration from source populations (the rescue effect) (Brown and KodricBrown 1977;Pulliam 1988) or emigration to sink populations (Amarasekare and Nisbet 2001). Underlying these effects were changes in source and sink regions that deviated from fundamental niche space due to dispersal between and reflecting boundaries near favorable or unfavorable habitat.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Consistent with other studies, our analysis showed that competition can reduce a species range (Case et al 2005), and that dispersal can cause species distributions to differ from fundamental niche space due to immigration from source populations (the rescue effect) (Brown and KodricBrown 1977;Pulliam 1988) or emigration to sink populations (Amarasekare and Nisbet 2001). Underlying these effects were changes in source and sink regions that deviated from fundamental niche space due to dispersal between and reflecting boundaries near favorable or unfavorable habitat.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In addition to selection from abiotic factors, biotic interactions can influence range margins [141], and are likely to differ in importance between native and introduced ranges as well as between invasive and endangered species. There are several mechanisms by which negative interactions (e.g.…”
Section: Ecological Nichementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the abundance and distribution of species may be determined by interactions of individuals with competitors of their own or other species, with predators and parasites, and with the abiotic environment (4). In the context of ecosystem response to global climate change, considerable emphasis has been placed on the question of how plant community composition and productivity will respond to warming (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%