2017
DOI: 10.1515/nor-2017-0401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Community-Based Information Infrastructure of Older Adult Digital Learning

Abstract: In the United States of America, senior centers and public libraries are ubiquitous social institutions found in virtually every municipality. This article analyses these institutions as community-based information infrastructure in the digital learning practices of older adults. Older adults turn to these institutions to learn technology in retirement. How learning takes place in these spaces is shaped both by the institutions, and by the older adults. Negotiations between institutions and older adults shape … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While DITL does draw aspects of its lineage from developmental psychology (e.g., Gillen et al, 2006), more recently (Gillen, 2016), and in our study, it is oriented by sociomaterialism, including Law's (2016) argument that 'theory making should not take place outside careful reflection on case studies, in which the knowledge making practices of the researchers are implicated' (Gillen, 2016, p. 2). Our study, like Gillen's (2016), engaged with the DITL methodology for its ability to allow us to study literacies and 'moments of being in situ' (p. 2), in a form of what we call an inquiry of radical specificity, or the ability to generate knowledge and theory by paying vigilant attention to the details, trajectories and make-up of literacies in action and the moment-to-moment doing of these literacies and the events that produced them and in which they were produced.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…While DITL does draw aspects of its lineage from developmental psychology (e.g., Gillen et al, 2006), more recently (Gillen, 2016), and in our study, it is oriented by sociomaterialism, including Law's (2016) argument that 'theory making should not take place outside careful reflection on case studies, in which the knowledge making practices of the researchers are implicated' (Gillen, 2016, p. 2). Our study, like Gillen's (2016), engaged with the DITL methodology for its ability to allow us to study literacies and 'moments of being in situ' (p. 2), in a form of what we call an inquiry of radical specificity, or the ability to generate knowledge and theory by paying vigilant attention to the details, trajectories and make-up of literacies in action and the moment-to-moment doing of these literacies and the events that produced them and in which they were produced.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Diversas iniciativas podem ser encontradas na literatura sobre o uso da tecnologia para promover a inclusão, seja para pessoas com deficiência (Terrazas-Arellanes et al, 2018;Aunio e Education, 2016;Souza e Rocha, 2019;Galasso et al, 2018), imigrantes (Colucci et al, 2017;Castano-Muñoz, 2018), idosos e outros grupos que enfrentam barreiras ou alguma situação de vulnerabilidade no acesso às tecnologias digitais (Lenstra, 2017;Wong et al, 2017). No entanto, parece haver uma lacuna na disponibilidade de plataformas e ecossistemas que promovam a inclusão em contextos de ensino e de aprendizagem.…”
Section: Fundamentação Teórica E Trabalhos Relacionadosunclassified
“…Several initiatives have been found in the literature on the use of technology to promote inclusion, whether for people with disabilities [ 27 30 ], immigrants [ 31 , 32 ], elderly people and other groups that face barriers or some situation of vulnerability regarding access to digital technologies [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Digital Ecosystems For Learning and Inclusion: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%