“…While DITL does draw aspects of its lineage from developmental psychology (e.g., Gillen et al, 2006), more recently (Gillen, 2016), and in our study, it is oriented by sociomaterialism, including Law's (2016) argument that 'theory making should not take place outside careful reflection on case studies, in which the knowledge making practices of the researchers are implicated' (Gillen, 2016, p. 2). Our study, like Gillen's (2016), engaged with the DITL methodology for its ability to allow us to study literacies and 'moments of being in situ' (p. 2), in a form of what we call an inquiry of radical specificity, or the ability to generate knowledge and theory by paying vigilant attention to the details, trajectories and make-up of literacies in action and the moment-to-moment doing of these literacies and the events that produced them and in which they were produced.…”