2002
DOI: 10.1177/1094428102005001002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Coming of Age of Interpretive Organizational Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advocates of such reflexivity point to its potential to create dialogue with others (Gabriel, 2015), where 'more open conversations will generate more perspectives, ideas, and insight that inform emerging theoretical insights' (Hibbert et al, 2014, p. 292). Thus these criteria support the development of new contributions within the interpretive traditions (Prasad and Prasad, 2002;Zald, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Advocates of such reflexivity point to its potential to create dialogue with others (Gabriel, 2015), where 'more open conversations will generate more perspectives, ideas, and insight that inform emerging theoretical insights' (Hibbert et al, 2014, p. 292). Thus these criteria support the development of new contributions within the interpretive traditions (Prasad and Prasad, 2002;Zald, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This qualitative study aims to illustrate employer perceptions of the employability of NC‐SIEs and to provide deep and rich explanations of the phenomenon (Prasad and Prasad ). Owing to the subjective nature of the topic, interviews were chosen as the best means to allow the informants scope to express their views on the topic, and provided an efficient method to collate highly personalised data with a good return rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Situated within the broad framework of qualitative inquiry, this research emerges from interpretive and post-positivist genres and is a response to moving beyond the paradigmatic cage of objectivist, functionalist approaches, into greater experimentation and engagement (Gartner and Birley, 2002;Grant and Perrin, 2002). Such research centres on both the micro and macro worlds of meaning, intermeshing individual data in the context of large-scale societal processes and phenomena (Cope, 2005;Prasad and Prasad, 2002;Sandberg, 2005). In this framework the interpretive bricoleur understands that research is an interactive process shaped by his or her personal history, biography, gender, social class, race, and ethnicity, and by those of the people in the setting.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%