2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The combined effects of activity space and neighbourhood of residence on participation in preventive health-care activities: The case of cervical screening in the Paris metropolitan area (France)

Abstract: To cite this version:Julie Vallée, Emmanuelle Cadot, Francesca Grillo, Isabelle Parizot, Pierre Chauvin. The combined effects of activity space and neighbourhood of residence on participation in preventive health-care activities: The case of cervical screening in the Paris metropolitan area (France).. Health Place, Elsevier, 2010, 16 (5) AbstractEstimates from multilevel regression of 1768 women living in the Paris metropolitan area showed that women who reported concentrating their daily activities in their … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
87
1
13

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(59 reference statements)
6
87
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the same trend between screening participation and the four care accessibility profiles was observed regardless of the category of agglomeration, we were probably therefore not able to specifically take context effects into account, in particular, in large cities, in which there is significant intra-urban care supply heterogeneity. Furthermore, it is possible that the area of residence alone is not a relevant datum and that it should be analyzed in conjunction with other characteristics, such as women's mobility, which has been shown to be a determining factor in cervical cancer screening participation in the Paris area (16). As well, an increasing number of studies point to the importance of no longer considering only the area of residence alone, but also individuals' places of activity, in particular, occupational activity (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the same trend between screening participation and the four care accessibility profiles was observed regardless of the category of agglomeration, we were probably therefore not able to specifically take context effects into account, in particular, in large cities, in which there is significant intra-urban care supply heterogeneity. Furthermore, it is possible that the area of residence alone is not a relevant datum and that it should be analyzed in conjunction with other characteristics, such as women's mobility, which has been shown to be a determining factor in cervical cancer screening participation in the Paris area (16). As well, an increasing number of studies point to the importance of no longer considering only the area of residence alone, but also individuals' places of activity, in particular, occupational activity (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that have taken them into account simultaneously are rare (9, 10,16), yet evaluating their combined effect in addition to their individual effect provides a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying screening participation. To our knowledge, only one analysis has documented the combined effect of contextual variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the French-speaking general population in the Greater Paris area, 8% of concerned women had never been screened for cervical cancer in 2010 (Rondet et al, 2014). Multiple factors associated with an increased risk of no lifetime screening have been reported, such as socioeconomic status and origin (Vallée et al, 2010;Grillo et al, 2012;Rondet et al, 2014), but it has never been studied among homeless women in France.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies have focused on the neighbourhood factors associated with health (Silhol, Zins, Chauvin, & Chaix, 2011) or health care (Vallée, Cadot, Grillo, Parizot, & Chauvin, 2010), after adjustment for individuals' SES.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%