1995
DOI: 10.1037/h0094425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The collection of home and laboratory dreams by means of an instrumental response technique.

Abstract: A new technology for dream collection, an instrumental response technique, was used to record dreams in both the sleep laboratory and in the subjects' own homes. This technique employs a switch attached to the sleeper's hand. The subject is asked to depress the switch to signal the presence of dream experiences during sleep. Comparisons were made between dream reports from home and laboratory collected under uniform sampling conditions. Differences in signalling frequency between REM and NREM sleep were noted.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present REM recall estimate of 81.9% also compares favorably with both (1) an estimate of 83.3% from over 200 subjects and 2,000 REM sleep awakenings (Dement 1965) and 2 (Armitage 1980;Armitage et al 1992;Cavallero et al 1992;Goodenough et al 1965a;Herman et al 1978;Pivik & Foulkes 1968). On average, recall from these stages is equal to that of stage 2 sleep; a tally of eight studies (Cavallero et al 1992;Fein et al 1985;Foulkes 1966;Lloyd & Cartwright 1995;Moffitt et al 1982;Pivik 1971;Pivik & Foulkes 1968;Rotenberg 1993b) revealed an average recall rate of 52.5 Ϯ 18.6%. The average stage REM recall rate in these studies was 82.2 Ϯ 8.1%.…”
Section: Nrem Sleepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present REM recall estimate of 81.9% also compares favorably with both (1) an estimate of 83.3% from over 200 subjects and 2,000 REM sleep awakenings (Dement 1965) and 2 (Armitage 1980;Armitage et al 1992;Cavallero et al 1992;Goodenough et al 1965a;Herman et al 1978;Pivik & Foulkes 1968). On average, recall from these stages is equal to that of stage 2 sleep; a tally of eight studies (Cavallero et al 1992;Fein et al 1985;Foulkes 1966;Lloyd & Cartwright 1995;Moffitt et al 1982;Pivik 1971;Pivik & Foulkes 1968;Rotenberg 1993b) revealed an average recall rate of 52.5 Ϯ 18.6%. The average stage REM recall rate in these studies was 82.2 Ϯ 8.1%.…”
Section: Nrem Sleepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 The relevance of dream health to waking physical and mental health has been pointed out in a recent study. Collecting dreams in the laboratory is costly and not usually covered by insurance.…”
Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antrobus et al 1995;Aserinsky & Kleitman 1953;Casagrande et al 1996a;Castaldo & Holzman 1969;Conduit et al 1997;Dement 1955;Dement & Kleitman 1957b;Fein et al 1985;Foulkes 1962;Foulkes & Pope 1973;Foulkes & Schmidt 1983;Foulkes & Rechtschaffen 1964;Goodenough et al 1959;1965b;Hobson et al 1965;Jouvet et al 1960;Kamiya 1962;Kremen 1961;Lloyd & Cartwright 1995;Moffitt et al 1982;Molinari & Foulkes 1969;Nielsen et al 1998;Orlinsky 1962;Porte & Hobson 1996;Rechtschaffen et al 1963a;Rotenberg 1993b;Slover et al 1987;Snyder 1965;Stoyva 1965;Waterman 1992;Wolpert 1960;Wolpert & Trosman 1958;Zimmerman 1970. Antrobus et al 1995;Aserinsky & Kleitman 1953;Casagrande et al 1996a;Castaldo & Holzman 1969;Conduit et al 1997;Dement 1955;Dement & Kleitman 1957b;Fein et al 1985;…”
Section: Notesunclassified