The collaborative conflict management style and cultural diversity in DGSS supported fuzzy tasks: an experimental investigation

Samarah, Imad M.; Paul, Souren; Mykytyn, Peter P.; Seetharaman, Priya

doi:10.1109/hicss.2003.1173758

Cited by 9 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Samarah et al [19] found a higher degree of agreement for Americans than Asians, however that score was due to higher initial disagreement resulting in a greater change. Setlock et al [20], however, found greater levels of persuasion in homogeneously Chinese pairings, which is consistent with D. Zhang et al's [26] findings that Chinese were more willing to give into group judgments than were Americans.…”

Section: Persuasionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Culture Interact with Media Richness? The Effects of Audio vs. Video Conferencing on Chinese and American Dyads

Setlock

Quinones

Fussell

2007

2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Persuasionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Culture Interact with Media Richness? The Effects of Audio vs. Video Conferencing on Chinese and American Dyads

Setlock

Quinones

Fussell

2007

2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They first discuss and rate for these options, and then try to solve the conflicts among participants, finally identify an option as a choice by voting. [21] C. Trading Tasks 1) Day Trader…”

Section: ) Computer Use Feementioning

confidence: 99%

A brief review: Groupware evaluation by performance of specific tasks

Guo

Zheng

2013

2013 IEEE International Conference of IEEE Region 10 (TENCON 2013)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Benchmarks are popular in many fields, but rare or absent in the CSCW research. Performance based evaluation would be a good choice if given a certain set of specific tasks. As the first step to promote a benchmark, we conduct this brief review about groupware evaluation by performance of specific tasks. Particularly, we collect commonly used specific tasks and classify them into four categories: hidden profile tasks, cognitive conflict tasks, trading tasks, and repair tasks. We also identify some challenges to achieve a benchmark.

show abstract

“…Second, they assessed the total amount of participation, influence, or consensus and not participation or influence equality or decision shifts (e.g., Easton, George, Nunamaker, & Pendergast, 1990;Hiltz, Johnson, & Turoff, 1991;Olaniran, 1996;Straus, 1997). 6 Finally, they did not include enough information to calculate effects (e.g., Burke & Chidambaram, 1994;Hwang & Guynes, 1994;Mejias et al, 1996;Mejias et al, 1997;Samarah, Paul, Mykytyn, & Seetharaman, 2003). A total of 44 studies involving 48 different experiments were examined in the final analyses.…”

Section: Literature Searchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6 Finally, they did not include enough information to calculate effects (e.g., Burke & Chidambaram, 1994;Hwang & Guynes, 1994;Mejias et al, 1996;Mejias et al, 1997;Samarah, Paul, Mykytyn, & Seetharaman, 2003). A total of 44 studies involving 48 different experiments were examined in the final analyses.…”

Section: Literature Searchmentioning

confidence: 99%