2017
DOI: 10.1257/mic.20160201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Coevolution of Segregation, Polarized Beliefs, and Discrimination: The Case of Private versus State Education

Abstract: Abstract:In this paper we analyze the coevolution of segregation into private and state schools, beliefs about the educational merits of di¤erent schools, and labour market discrimination. In a dynamic model, we characterize a necessary and su¢ cient condition on initial levels of segregation and beliefs under which full polarisation of beliefs and long run labour market discrimination are sustainable. The model suggests a new perspective on the long term e¤ects of di¤erent policy interventions, such as integr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, persistent preferences/pedagogical beliefs relative to what constitutes the optimal placement of students (between and within-schools) from both parents and schools' authorities may also explain such time consistency of segregation patterns. Indeed, Levy & Razin's (2017) theoretical framework predicts, in particular, the possibility of persistent between-school segregation patterns due to parents' (possibly incorrect) beliefs. In this view, the case of 5 th to 9 th graders with differing academic abilities subject to a somewhat more uneven placement withinschools should again be highlighted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, persistent preferences/pedagogical beliefs relative to what constitutes the optimal placement of students (between and within-schools) from both parents and schools' authorities may also explain such time consistency of segregation patterns. Indeed, Levy & Razin's (2017) theoretical framework predicts, in particular, the possibility of persistent between-school segregation patterns due to parents' (possibly incorrect) beliefs. In this view, the case of 5 th to 9 th graders with differing academic abilities subject to a somewhat more uneven placement withinschools should again be highlighted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agents such as school authorities and parents likely try to optimally place them according to their specific preferences and goals, possibly to reap the benefits and avoid the costs from exposure to certain types of peers. Still on this topic, Levy & Razin (2017) present a theoretical model showing that due to a learning failure while in the labor market, repeating generations of parents may persist with different beliefs regarding which the best school might be (the most productivity-enhancing school) to send their children to, thus perpetuating segregation, even if there are no real differences between schools in terms of the value added accrued to students (i.e. to their offspring, the next generation of parents).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Non-strategic models of selection/correlation neglect include, e.g., Streufert (2000); DeMarzo, Vayanos, and Zwiebel (2003); Glaeser and Sunstein (2009); Ortoleva and Snowberg (2015); Levy and Razin (2015); Ellis and Piccione (2017).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Non-strategic models of selection/correlation neglect include, e.g., Streufert (2000); DeMarzo, Vayanos, and Zwiebel (2003); Glaeser and Sunstein (2009); Ortoleva and Snowberg (2015); Levy and Razin (2015); Ellis and Piccione (2017).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%