2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3165748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersed Behavior and Perceptions in Assortative Societies

Abstract: We take an equilibrium-based approach to study the interplay between behavior and misperceptions in coordination games with assortative interactions. Our focus is assortativity neglect, where agents fail to take into account the extent of assortativity in society.We show, first, that assortativity neglect amplifies action dispersion, both in fixed societies and by exacerbating the effect of social changes. Second, unlike other misperceptions, assortativity neglect is a misperception that agents can rationalize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is one important difference with the fragility mechanism in the current paper: Whereas Theorem 1 relied on misperceptions for which SS(F,F ) consists of a single stateω, the present identification failure leads SS(q,q) to always include all states in Ω. Thus, determining which steady states beliefs converge to requires substantially different techniques, which we develop in Frick, Iijima, and Ishii (2019c). Using these techniques, we show that, similar to Theorem 1, arbitrarily small amounts of misperception can again lead the agent's belief to converge to a point mass on the same fixed statê ω, regardless of the true state ω (see Section 6.2 of Frick, Iijima, and Ishii, 2019c).…”
Section: Single-agent Active Learning With Identification Failuresmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, there is one important difference with the fragility mechanism in the current paper: Whereas Theorem 1 relied on misperceptions for which SS(F,F ) consists of a single stateω, the present identification failure leads SS(q,q) to always include all states in Ω. Thus, determining which steady states beliefs converge to requires substantially different techniques, which we develop in Frick, Iijima, and Ishii (2019c). Using these techniques, we show that, similar to Theorem 1, arbitrarily small amounts of misperception can again lead the agent's belief to converge to a point mass on the same fixed statê ω, regardless of the true state ω (see Section 6.2 of Frick, Iijima, and Ishii, 2019c).…”
Section: Single-agent Active Learning With Identification Failuresmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In Section 4.3, we illustrated by looking at steady states, that single-agent learning does not become decoupled when the signal technology satisfies an identification assumption. Our companion paper, Frick, Iijima, and Ishii (2019c), analyzes learning dynamics in a general class of misspecified learning environments that nests single-agent active learning and presents formal belief-convergence results.…”
Section: Single-agent Active Learning With Identification Failuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations