2015
DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.46.4.0423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Codevelopment of Mathematical Concepts and the Practice of Defining

Abstract: We examined the codevelopment of mathematical concepts and the mathematical practice of defining within a sixth-grade class investigating space and geometry. Drawing upon existing literature, we present a framework for describing forms of participation in defining, what we term aspects of definitional practice. Analysis of classroom interactions during 16 episodes spanning earlier and later phases of instruction illustrate how student participation in aspects of definitional practice influenced their emerging … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of processes, the discourse expresses actions and is personalized, whilst in the case of objects, it reveals states and has an impersonal character. In our case, we can see that Anna starts the lesson with procedural definitions (i.e., describing how to construct an object) instead of structural definitions (i.e., describing properties that characterize an object) (Kobiela & Lehrer, 2015). These types of procedural definitions with generic examples justify the use of the remaining types of examples (concrete, worked-out examples, and exercises) to consolidate the use of the procedures or become familiar with the notation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the case of processes, the discourse expresses actions and is personalized, whilst in the case of objects, it reveals states and has an impersonal character. In our case, we can see that Anna starts the lesson with procedural definitions (i.e., describing how to construct an object) instead of structural definitions (i.e., describing properties that characterize an object) (Kobiela & Lehrer, 2015). These types of procedural definitions with generic examples justify the use of the remaining types of examples (concrete, worked-out examples, and exercises) to consolidate the use of the procedures or become familiar with the notation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, n.d.). Concepts can be reconstructed through the following activities: 1) proposing concept definitions, 2) constructing and evaluating examples rather than examples, 3) definition of nature and relations, 4) construction of definitions by explanation or argument, 5) revision of definitions, 6) proving and reasoning about the relationship system, 7) asking the definition of the question, and 8) negotiating the criteria of adequacy and acceptance of the definition, so that the concept can be taught through various learning activities (Kobiela & Lehrer, 2015).…”
Section: Mathematics Objectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alvarado Monroy y González Astudillo (2016) estudiaron cómo construyen definiciones los estudiantes universitarios cuando hacen demostraciones e identificaron distintos tipos de definiciones. Por otro lado, Kobiela y Lehrer (2015) analizaron las interacciones que se producen entre estudiantes de Educación Primaria cuando estos construyen definiciones geométricas. Más recientemente, Gilboa, Kidron y Dreyfus (2019) han investigado a estudiantes de Educación Secundaria que trabajaban por parejas mientras construían definiciones matemáticas formales vinculadas a la idea de recta tangente.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified