The Coaching Behavior Scale for Sport: Factor Structure Examination for Singaporean Youth Athletes

Koh, Koon Teck; Kawabata, Masato; Mallett, Clifford J.

doi:10.1260/1747-9541.9.6.1311

Cited by 13 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Koh and colleagues decided, however, to remove one item of the CBS‐S competition strategies subscale, which was argued to be irrelevant for the specific sample under study. Their findings supported the factorial validity of the 46 remaining items, and also the concurrent validity of the CBS‐S with coaching satisfaction (Koh et al., in press).…”

mentioning

confidence: 53%

“…Moreover, a subscale labeled competition strategies, not included in the initial study (Côté et al., ), was later added (Baker et al., ). To date, only one study has used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm the proposed factor structure of the 47‐item version of the scale (Koh et al., in press). Koh and colleagues decided, however, to remove one item of the CBS‐S competition strategies subscale, which was argued to be irrelevant for the specific sample under study.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Coaching Behavior Scale for Sport (CBS‐S): A psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version

Carlsson

Lundqvist

2014

Scandinavian Med Sci Sports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study validated a Swedish version of the 47-item Coaching Behavior Scale for Sport (CBS-S). Sample 1 consisted of 506 team sport athletes [262 men and 244 women; mean age: 22.20, standard deviation (SD) = 3.90] distributed across 41 coaches at the two highest national levels of various sports. Athletes completed the CBS-S and established questionnaires of coaching behaviors (LSS), self-confidence (CSAI-2R), and coach-athlete relationship (CART-Q). An additional sample of 39 basketball players (21 men and 18 women; mean age = 17.40, SD = 2.39) completed the CBS-S twice, approximately 4 weeks apart. Confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable model fit for the seven-factor version of the CBS-S, although two items of the negative personal rapport subscale displayed insufficient factor loadings. Correlations between the subscales of the CBS-S and established instruments were in accordance with theoretical expectations, supporting the concurrent validity. Cronbach's alpha (> 0.82) for all dimensions provided support for the reliability of the CBS-S, and test-retest correlations indicated moderate stability over time. Cultural differences in the assessment of coaching behaviors and the usability of the CBS-S by coaches for self-reflection and development are discussed.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 53%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Coaching Behavior Scale for Sport (CBS‐S): A psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version

Carlsson

Lundqvist

2014

Scandinavian Med Sci Sports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, they stated that the amount of variance explained was between 55 and 58% for three pairs of variables (goal setting-mental preparation, competition strategies-mental preparation and competition strategies-technical skills). Koh et al (2014) stated that the lowest average scores came from negative personal rapport factor, while the highest average scores came from technical skills factor.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation of Behaviour Styles of the Coaches of Athletes Who Competed at 2018 Snowboard Cross World Cup

Gül¹,

Birinci²,

Ağaoğlu³

2019

ujer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coaches are one of the leading people who have a role in athletes' success. Physical and physiological characteristics of many elite athletes are close to each other. The most important psychological factor as the distinguishing element bringing success is the coaches' behavioral approaches to their athletes. It is important to find out the behavioural styles of the coaches of athletes who are representing their countries in international organizations and who are showing top level performance in increasing their countries' success. In this sense, the purpose of this study is to analyze the coaching behaviour styles of the coaches of snowboard cross athletes representing their countries in the world cup. The study is a descriptive study in the model of survey. 3-item personal information form developed by the researcher and Coaching Behaviour Scale for Sport-CBS-S consisting of 7 factors and 47 items were used as data collection tool. The scale was given to 68 of 97 athletes competing for different countries in Snowboard Cross World Cup that was held in Erzurum/ Turkey in January 2018. Percentage, frequency, mean and average values were used in the analysis of data. Various difference tests were used to find out the differences between variables. 24 female and 44 male athletes participated in the study. Average age of the athletes was found as 25,16±4,53. No significant difference was found in terms of the variables of age, gender and the continent athletes participated from and it was found that athletes assessed the positive behavioural styles of coaches in very high levels (6,98±1,21), while they assessed their negative coaching behaviours in very low levels (1,08±0,14). According to the results obtained, it is recommended for behavioural styles of coaches assessed within the context of similar researches to be applied to other sport branches.

show abstract

“…The rationale behind this finding was considered to rest in the age of athletes and their need for more pre-teaching in comparison with more experienced athletes [26]. In addition to CBS-S validity and reliability research in different nations and various sport types; in Turkish context [12], among athletes from 15 different sports [33], coach-athlete relationship in different sports were examined qualitatively [35], Singaporean youth athletes [36], Swedish athletes [37], volleyball players [38] and Indian athletes [39]. Baker et al [34] examined individual and team sport members.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Coaching behavior research has been widely examined with various ages, levels, and contexts [31,32], supporting the important and pertinent aspects of coaching. The Coaching Behavior Scale (CBS), after extensive review, has been found to be a reliable and valid instrument in the literature; among athletes from 15 different sports [33], team and individual sports [34], coach-athlete relationship in different sports were examined qualitatively [35], Singaporean youth athletes [36], Swedish athletes [37], volleyball players [38] and Indian athletes [39]. The CBS demonstrated that each category is crucial and valuable when evaluating a coach's behavior.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of coaching behaviors on tennis players and swimmers

Cengiz

SERBES>

Erdoğan

et al. 2019

PPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose . The purpose of the current research is to investigate tennis players and swimmers’ perceived coaching behaviors for sport with sport age. Material/Methods : A cross-sectional survey method was applied to tennis players and swimmers (Buyukozturk et al., 2012). Participants (nfemales=175; nmales=187) were selected from different tennis (n=122) and swimming (n=240) clubs in Canakkale, Istanbul and Hatay provinces. For data collection, a translated Turkish version (Yapar et al., 2014) of the Coaching Behavior Scale for Sport (CBS-S) (Côté et al., 1999) was used. The CBS-S includes 47 items and 7 sub-dimensions. The collected data were analyzed with descriptive and One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistics. The CBS-S sub-dimensions were evaluated with the sport age of tennis players and swimmers (p<.05). Results: According to the One-Way ANOVA, sport age was statistically significant in the sub-divisions of physical training and condition, technical skills, mental preparation, goal setting, competition strategies and personal rapport among tennis players (p<.05). Among swimmers, sport age was significant for only negative personal rapport (p<.05). Conclusions: Tennis players and swimmers’ perceived Coaching Behavior for Sport scores were evaluated as high. Sport age was significant for the Coaching Behavior for Sport sub-dimensions among tennis players.

show abstract

The Coaching Behavior Scale for Sport: Factor Structure Examination for Singaporean Youth Athletes

Cited by 13 publications

References 37 publications

The Coaching Behavior Scale for Sport (CBS‐S): A psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version

The Coaching Behavior Scale for Sport (CBS‐S): A psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version

Investigation of Behaviour Styles of the Coaches of Athletes Who Competed at 2018 Snowboard Cross World Cup

The effect of coaching behaviors on tennis players and swimmers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About