2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1679-87592011000200002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The co-influence of the sea breeze and the coastal upwelling at Cabo Frio: a numerical investigation using coupled models

Abstract: A B S T R A C TA coupled atmospheric-oceanic model was used to investigate whether there is a positive feedback between the coastal upwelling and the sea breeze at Cabo Frio -RJ (Brazil). Two experiments were performed to ascertain the influence of the sea breeze on the coastal upwelling: the first one used the coupled model forced with synoptic NE winds of 8 m s -1 and the sign of the sea breeze circulation was set by the atmospheric model; the second experiment used only the oceanic model with constant 8 m s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the coastal upwelling should intensify the OA interaction processes in this region whose consequences are not yet known [34]- [36]. According [34] the sea-breeze is stronger October-March, when the upwelling occurs, and weaker April-September, when there is no upwelling.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the coastal upwelling should intensify the OA interaction processes in this region whose consequences are not yet known [34]- [36]. According [34] the sea-breeze is stronger October-March, when the upwelling occurs, and weaker April-September, when there is no upwelling.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the presence of upwelling can cause a sea-breeze like circulation to be superimposed on the synoptic flow, potentially weakening the alongshore component of the wind field (e.g. Ribeiro et al, 2011). However, such effects should be of second order importance for the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%