2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01697-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clonogenic assay: robustness of plating efficiency-based analysis is strongly compromised by cellular cooperation

Abstract: Background The clonogenic assay is a versatile and frequently used tool to quantify reproductive cell survival in vitro. Current state-of-the-art analysis relies on plating efficiency-based calculations which assume a linear correlation between the number of cells seeded and the number of colonies counted. The present study was designed to test the validity of this assumption and to evaluate the robustness of clonogenic survival results obtained. Methods A panel of 50 established cancer cell lines was used f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although DNA damage markers such as γ-H2AX are detectable within less than an hour after irradiation, the irradiated cells initiate DNA damage repair programs [20][21][22]; hence, the effect of ionizing radiation on the level of cellular viability is measurable following a significantly longer timescale. The 'classical' method for analysis of effect of ionizing radiation is the clonogenic assay which can be carried out even several weeks after the irradiation [23]. Here, we set out to explore whether the resazurin assay can be used for monitoring quicker responses on the level of cellular viability following irradiation, as shortening of assay times usually results in improved throughput.…”
Section: Combination Of Resazurin Assay With Irradiation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although DNA damage markers such as γ-H2AX are detectable within less than an hour after irradiation, the irradiated cells initiate DNA damage repair programs [20][21][22]; hence, the effect of ionizing radiation on the level of cellular viability is measurable following a significantly longer timescale. The 'classical' method for analysis of effect of ionizing radiation is the clonogenic assay which can be carried out even several weeks after the irradiation [23]. Here, we set out to explore whether the resazurin assay can be used for monitoring quicker responses on the level of cellular viability following irradiation, as shortening of assay times usually results in improved throughput.…”
Section: Combination Of Resazurin Assay With Irradiation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clonogenic assay is an in vitro cell survival assay based on the ability of a single cell to grow into a colony. It is often considered an essential 2D technique to confirm anti-proliferative activity previously observed in an MTT assay. Figure A,B illustrates the ability of compounds 51b and 51d to inhibit the formation of MDA-MB-231 cell colonies after adding treatment for 48 h, followed by a 7 day incubation with fresh media. Treatment with 1.15 μM compound 51b resulted in 75.3% growth, and a 2.30 μM treatment resulted in 60.3% growth.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…13 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.17 (q, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.76 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.93−1.77 (m, 2H). 13 Methyl (31). General procedure 2.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the well plate was incubated at room temperature for 15 min and the cells were washed with deionized water and air-dried in order to count the colonies. Colonies consisting of more than 50 cells were counted for the clonogenic assay [ 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Super-hydrophobic biomaterial coating for applications such as controlled drug release and reduction of bacterial interaction on implants requires the critical evaluation of cell behavior mediated by surface wettability and topography. However, the effects of surface energy and surface roughness on cell viability are often contradictory as cell behavior can be highly dependent on cell type [24]. To comprehensively evaluate the interaction of mammalian cells on the fabricated superhydrophobic coating, MTT assay was conducted to study the viability of the L929 cell line in differing concentrations of PDMS: SS coating with the utilization of zinc diethyldithiocarbamate (ZDEC) as a positive control.…”
Section: Mtt Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%