Interarm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBPD) can predict cardiovascular disease. To investigate the relationship between IASBPD and cardiovascular disease risk factors, a total of 1426 individuals were studied. Blood pressure was assessed simultaneously and IASBPD was expressed as the absolute difference value (|R−L|).Cardiovascular disease risk factors were compared between the high IASBPD group (IASBPD ≥10 mm Hg) and the normal IASBPD group (IASBPD <10 mm Hg). An increased prevalence of hypertension, body mass index, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were observed in the high IASBPD group (P<.05), associated with the enhanced mean values of intima-media thickness and maximum intima-media thickness (P<.05). Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity was increased, while ankle-brachial index was lower in the high IASBPD group (P<.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that IASBPD ≥10 mm Hg was positively associated with body mass index (odds ratio, 1.077; P=.002) and systolic blood pressure (odds ratio, 1.032; P<.001), and negatively associated with ankle-brachial index (odds ratio, 0.038;
P<.001).
| INTRODUCTIONThe lower ankle-brachial index (ABI) is associated with the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD).The question is raised "what does the systolic blood pressure (SBP) difference between the two arms indicate?" It has been reported that interarm SBP difference (IASBPD) is associated with peripheral vascular disease, which has been considered a predictor of CVD.1 A previous study demonstrated that CVD can be predicted when IASBPD is ≥10 mm Hg. 2 However, the association between IASBPD and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality remains elusive.Current hypertension guidelines suggest that blood pressure (BP) assessment in both arms should be used as an initial evaluation parameter of hypertension. An interarm BP difference of <10 mm Hg can be considered a normal condition, whereas the difference of ≥20/10 mm Hg demands further attention and investigation. 3 The BP difference between arms was first reported more than 100 years ago, but its clinical significance was not recognized until recently. A meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of IASBPD ≥10 mm Hg was 19.6%, 4 indicating that this is not a small probability event and PAD is also not the unique reason for IASBPD. Knowledge of the interarm BP difference remains limited, which could be important for accurate BP measurement and treatment decisions, and may be a potential risk marker for CVD. Although a questionnaire survey revealed that a consensus has been reached among 77% of physicians that BP should be measured in both arms, only 30% of respondents agreed with this recommendation, while over half disagreed, and a mere 13% adhered to it. 5 These studies show that most of the clinicians ignored the importance of measurement of BP in both arms because they did not realize the clinical significance.Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaque formation are associated with CVD, 6 as we...