1985
DOI: 10.1071/bt9850433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Classification of Poaceae: Subfamilies and Supertribes

Abstract: A comprehensive world classification of the Poaceae is presented in which 720 currently accepted genera are distributed among five subfamilies (Pooideae, Bambusoideae, Arundinoideae, Chloridoideae, Panicoideae) and six supertribes (Triticanae and Poanae, in Pooideae; Bambusanae and Oryzanae, in Bambusoideae; Panicanae and Andropogonanae, in Panicoideae). Synonyms in recent use are listed under appropriate groups. The classification reflects a variety of numerical analyses of generic descriptions, accounting fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
1
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tribe was raised to subfamily level by Soderstrom (1981), a decision followed by Clayton and Renvoize (1986), emphasizing the centothecoid embryo and leaf anatomical characters, mainly the palisade arrangement in the mesophyll. As previously mentioned, Soderstrom (1981), Watson et al (1985), and Watson and Dallwitz (1992) included the tribe within Bambusoideae, while Barker et al (1995), Clark et al (1995), Soreng and Davis (1998), Gómez-Martínez and Culham (2000), and Sánchez- Ken and Clark (2003) pointed out, based on molecular characters, the relationship of Centotheceae with Panicoideae.…”
Section: Centotheceaementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The tribe was raised to subfamily level by Soderstrom (1981), a decision followed by Clayton and Renvoize (1986), emphasizing the centothecoid embryo and leaf anatomical characters, mainly the palisade arrangement in the mesophyll. As previously mentioned, Soderstrom (1981), Watson et al (1985), and Watson and Dallwitz (1992) included the tribe within Bambusoideae, while Barker et al (1995), Clark et al (1995), Soreng and Davis (1998), Gómez-Martínez and Culham (2000), and Sánchez- Ken and Clark (2003) pointed out, based on molecular characters, the relationship of Centotheceae with Panicoideae.…”
Section: Centotheceaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CLASSIFICATION In our classification of Panicoideae in the New World (Table 1; http://mobot.mobot.org/W3T/Search/nwgclass.html) we recognize eight tribes (Andropogoneae, Arundinelleae, Centotheceae, Gynerieae, Isachneae, Paniceae, Steyermarkochloeae, and Thysanolaeneae), with nine subtribes in Andropogoneae (Andropogoninae, Anthistiriinae, Coicinae, Germainiinae, Ischaeminae, Rottboelliinae, Saccharinae, Sorghinae, and Tripsacinae) and seven subtribes in Paniceae (Arthropogoninae, Cenchrinae, Digitariinae, Melinidinae, Panicinae, Paspalinae, and Setariinae). This realignment is based on previous morphological and molecular work (Clayton and Renvoize 1986;Watson and Dallwitz 1992;Gómez-Martinez and Culham 2000;Zuloaga et al 2000;Giussani et al 2001;GPWG 2001;Sánchez-Ken and Clark 2001;Barber et al 2002;Aliscioni et al 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations