2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-007-0403-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The classification of fibromyalgia syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
44
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Nerve growth factor (NGF), which stimulates the production of substance P in small, afferent, unmyelinated neurons, was found to be elevated in the CSF of FMS patients with primary FMS, but not in FMS with an associated painful inflammatory condition (secondary FMS) (71). This finding addresses the clinical finding of subgroups in FMS (72)(73)(74). Elevated CSF substance P could be a common link between primary and secondary FMS, but the groups differ with regard to the mechanism responsible for the elevated substance P. In primary FMS, NGF seems to induce the elevated CSF substance P from central interneurons.…”
Section: Central Sensitizationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Nerve growth factor (NGF), which stimulates the production of substance P in small, afferent, unmyelinated neurons, was found to be elevated in the CSF of FMS patients with primary FMS, but not in FMS with an associated painful inflammatory condition (secondary FMS) (71). This finding addresses the clinical finding of subgroups in FMS (72)(73)(74). Elevated CSF substance P could be a common link between primary and secondary FMS, but the groups differ with regard to the mechanism responsible for the elevated substance P. In primary FMS, NGF seems to induce the elevated CSF substance P from central interneurons.…”
Section: Central Sensitizationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Turk et al, [8] considered FMS as a heterogeneous disorder and also classified patients into three groups based on psychosocial and behavioral characteristics. On the other hand, Müller et al, [9] recommended dividing patients into four groups according to the existence of pain, depression secondary to pain, depression with concomitant FMS, and somatoform disorder. The authors suggested treatment with 5-HT3 receptorblocking agents in the subgroup with high pain sensitivity, antidepressant therapy for the subgroup characterized by depression, and psychotherapy in the group with somatoform pain disorder.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were classified as primary FM patients (with no definitive organic factor triggering the syndrome) according to the classification criteria of Mu¨ller et al (group 1: FM with sensitivity to pain but no diagnosis of depression or other relevant psychiatric disorder). 21 Six HW (who had no pain disorders or infectious illness at the time of blood sampling) served as the control group (mean AE SD age 26 AE 2 yr). The same exclusion criteria were applied to the control group as to the FM volunteers.…”
Section: Study Design and Fm Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%