1969
DOI: 10.1159/000155256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Chromosomes of Some Platyrrhini (Callicebus, Ateles and Saimiri)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chromosome dimorphism has also been described for pair A2 [Egozcue et al, 1969;Egozcue, 1972;Lau and Arrighi, 1976;this paper]. In this case, the difference in length affects the heterochromatic nucleolar organizer, and was interpreted by Egozcue [1972] as due to the insertion of part of a chromosome into its homologue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Chromosome dimorphism has also been described for pair A2 [Egozcue et al, 1969;Egozcue, 1972;Lau and Arrighi, 1976;this paper]. In this case, the difference in length affects the heterochromatic nucleolar organizer, and was interpreted by Egozcue [1972] as due to the insertion of part of a chromosome into its homologue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The polymorphism affecting the nonacrocentric/acrocentric ratio was inter preted by Egozcue et al [1969] as due to pericentric inversions. This opinion was supported by the results of Srivastava et al [1969] andDe Boer [1974], and confirmed by the banding studies carried out by Ma et al [1974], The peri centric inversions produced two acrocentric pairs, Cl and C2 out of two nonacrocentric pairs, B5 and B11, or vice versa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in Barros et al, 2000] and 2n = 20 in C. torquatus [C. t. torquatus in Benirschke & Bogart, 1976]. The diploid chromosome number reported in this last species was, until now, the lowest recorded in any primate [see also Egozcue et al, 1969]. Comparisons with other Neotropical primates indicated that Callicebus is a karyotypically shuffled taxon when compared to other, more conserved groups [Stanyon et al, 2000].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…2n = 50 can be found in C. hoffmannsi [Rodrigues et al, 2001] and C. donacophilus [C. moloch donacophilus in de Boer, 1974;Minezawa & Borda, 1984]; 2n = 48 in C. moloch [C. m. moloch in Pieczarka & Nagamachi, 1988] and C. brunneus [C. m. brunneus in Minezawa et al, 1989]; 2n = 46 in Callicebus sp. of the moloch group [C. moloch in Egozcue et al, 1969], C. cupreus [C. m. cupreus in Benirschke & Brownhill, 1963;de Boer, 1974;Benirschke & Bogart, 1976] and C. ornatus [C. m. ornatus in de Boer, 1974]; 2n = 22 in Callicebus sp. of the torquatus group [C. torquatus sp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%