1986
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(86)90265-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The characterization of electrochemically machined surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is suitable for plastic or press dies, wire-drawing dies and optical parts [13]. The experimental results of Mileham et al showed that the quality of the machined surface will be influenced by current density, flow rate of electrolyte and the gap width [14]. High-density pulsed direct current improves the precision of workpieces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is suitable for plastic or press dies, wire-drawing dies and optical parts [13]. The experimental results of Mileham et al showed that the quality of the machined surface will be influenced by current density, flow rate of electrolyte and the gap width [14]. High-density pulsed direct current improves the precision of workpieces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the experimental results of Mileham and others, the use of changing machining conditions will directly influence the quality of machined appearances. The experimental results of Mileham et al showed the quality of the machined surface will be influenced by the current density, flow rate of electrolyte, and the gap width [36]. Datta and Shenoy showed that the gap width between electrode and workpiece directly influences the current condition and the discharge dregs of the electrolyte [37].…”
Section: The Removal Rate Of Depthmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Datta and Landolt (1981) showed that the gap width between the electrode and workpiece directly influences the current condition and the discharge dreg of the electrolyte. The experimental results of Mileham et al (1986) proved that the quality of the machined surface would be influenced by factors including current density, flow rate of electrolyte and the gap width in the ECM. Bejar and Gutierrez (1983) used NaNO 3 as an electrolyte and changed the machining gap width as well as the concentration of electrolyte to investigate the influence on current efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%