2009
DOI: 10.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Changing Relationship Between the Government and the Nonprofit Sector in Iceland

Abstract: The paper illustrates a historical examination of nonprofit relations in welfare services in Iceland. Variables affecting the conditions under which different types of relations are developed are defined. The findings from the Icelandic case study coincide with other international studies describing some general changes in government-nonprofit relations in the 20 th century, from supplementary to more complex complementary and adversarial relations using Young's conceptualization. There are, however, some dist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power and success of this memory may stem from several factors, aside from the sheer quality of the documentary series itself. First, it is both informed by and recreates the neoliberal view of recent Icelandic history that has come to dominate the national discourse, which insists that Iceland was a backwards, closed, prejudiced society in the 1970s and 1980s, but with the advent of neoliberalism in Iceland in the form of its first self-proclaimed neoliberal government in 1991, became progressive, open, and free, both economically and socially (Hall 2020, 134-135;Árnason & Hafsteinsson 2018, 71-72;Kristmundsson 2003). Secondly, it functions as a balm for what has recently been termed Iceland's "post-colonial anxiety", i.e., its inferiority complex towards larger, more powerful first-world countries, in whose shadow the viability and first-world status of the tiny Icelandic state might be called into question (Hall 2020, 134-195).…”
Section: Discourses and Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The power and success of this memory may stem from several factors, aside from the sheer quality of the documentary series itself. First, it is both informed by and recreates the neoliberal view of recent Icelandic history that has come to dominate the national discourse, which insists that Iceland was a backwards, closed, prejudiced society in the 1970s and 1980s, but with the advent of neoliberalism in Iceland in the form of its first self-proclaimed neoliberal government in 1991, became progressive, open, and free, both economically and socially (Hall 2020, 134-135;Árnason & Hafsteinsson 2018, 71-72;Kristmundsson 2003). Secondly, it functions as a balm for what has recently been termed Iceland's "post-colonial anxiety", i.e., its inferiority complex towards larger, more powerful first-world countries, in whose shadow the viability and first-world status of the tiny Icelandic state might be called into question (Hall 2020, 134-195).…”
Section: Discourses and Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…For the first time, a government's white paper included privatisation objectives and goals linked to the outsourcing of programmes to private organisations in order to assure efficient and effective public services. This development led to an increase in different types of formal service contracts at various administrative levels (Kristmundsson 2009). A legislative framework for contracting and tendering was created.…”
Section: From Informal Relations Between the State And Npos To New Public Management In The Late 20th Centurymentioning
confidence: 99%