2018
DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Challenges of Writing in School: Conceptualizing Writing Development Within a Sociocognitive Framework

Abstract: This article argues for a conceptualization of school writing that emphasizes how cognitive and sociocultural factors interact. In academic, professional, and affinity-based communities, an emphasis on standards of quality drives the adoption of such practices as revision and peer and expert review. In school, everyday writing practices center around demonstrations of knowledge (taking notes, writing summaries, providing personal responses to readings, completing worksheets, etc.) where the teacher is often th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
(205 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these issues are not specific to studies of autistic individuals, they impact our ability to interpret grouplevel differences accurately given that the remote context further emphasizes that the purpose of writing is to produce a text in response to an assigned task (e.g., Schuster, 2004). These concerns align with highlights offered by Deane (2018) that suggested writing activities used in school settings are often more straightforward than teachers realize, which adds yet another layer to needing to account for how the purposes may influence text production across study-specific writing communities.…”
Section: Wwc Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these issues are not specific to studies of autistic individuals, they impact our ability to interpret grouplevel differences accurately given that the remote context further emphasizes that the purpose of writing is to produce a text in response to an assigned task (e.g., Schuster, 2004). These concerns align with highlights offered by Deane (2018) that suggested writing activities used in school settings are often more straightforward than teachers realize, which adds yet another layer to needing to account for how the purposes may influence text production across study-specific writing communities.…”
Section: Wwc Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of sentence complexity in the prescribed texts read by students may also have a negative impact on students" the capability to bring out the complexities in their writing (Deane, 2018;Jagaiah, Olinghouse, & Kearns, 2020). Heilke, Joslyn, & Aguado, (2003) suggested that readability has to be one of the prime measures for the selection of a textbook.…”
Section: Readability Index Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, students can express themselves through writing. In the learning process of writing skills, students describe their knowledge to teachers, and teachers use students' writing products to know the extent of their comprehension and to gain some points as to provide learning reflection for them (Deane, 2018;Graham et al, 2017). In such a way, teachers view students' writing works by drawing upon a formative assessment-informed principle to find better ways to improve students' further learning of English writing in a better way (Burner, 2015;Han & Fan, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%