2018
DOI: 10.1108/qrom-09-2018-597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenges and outcomes of critical diversity scholarship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The critical paradigm seeks to understand social phenomena by trying to unmask social inequalities, injustice and exploitation, challenging these through the empowerment of the disenfranchised. Research in this tradition emphasizes power inequalities, unequal chances, discrimination and structural differences among different social groups regarding exclusion from the labour market, (under)employment, or restriction of upward career mobility (Bleijenbergh et al, 2018; Zanoni et al, 2010; Romani et al, 2020b). Critical approaches uncover the allegedly neutral nature of cultural differences and highlight the inequalities and possible exploitative relationships between societies, organizations and social actors (Primecz et al, 2016), consequently denaturalization might lead to scientific breakthroughs (Romani et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Paradigmatic Multiplicity In Research On Organizations and M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical paradigm seeks to understand social phenomena by trying to unmask social inequalities, injustice and exploitation, challenging these through the empowerment of the disenfranchised. Research in this tradition emphasizes power inequalities, unequal chances, discrimination and structural differences among different social groups regarding exclusion from the labour market, (under)employment, or restriction of upward career mobility (Bleijenbergh et al, 2018; Zanoni et al, 2010; Romani et al, 2020b). Critical approaches uncover the allegedly neutral nature of cultural differences and highlight the inequalities and possible exploitative relationships between societies, organizations and social actors (Primecz et al, 2016), consequently denaturalization might lead to scientific breakthroughs (Romani et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Paradigmatic Multiplicity In Research On Organizations and M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRT developed along with other critical approaches paradigmatically driven to confront objectivism and realism and support methodological difference (Bleijenbergh et al ., 2018). CRT specifically is characterized as crossing different paradigms and eschewing the simplistic distinctions often characterized by distinguishing just between qualitative and quantitative approaches (Bleijenbergh et al ., 2018). It is specifically rooted in emancipatory theorizing (Cornelissen et al ., 2021) and understanding racialized experience as a complex phenomenon (Knight, 2016).…”
Section: Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial call to this special issue invited submissions that embrace age and ageing at the intersection of the organization beyond statistical and similar ‘what’ or ‘how many’ types of methodological approaches. We specifically asked authors to investigate, through a critically diverse qualitative approach (Bleijenbergh et al , 2018), the meanings, contexts and future of age and ageing by moving away from a deterministic number for ‘old age’ while moving toward innovative discursive understandings of the diverse older worker. We did acknowledge the United Nations (2017) statement that the global population is ageing at disproportionate rates across what they categorized as developing and developed countries.…”
Section: Contributions To Intersections Of Age and Ageing With Organi...mentioning
confidence: 99%