2007
DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v30i5.5171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenges and implications of assessing groundwater recharge: A case study – northern Sandveld, Western Cape,South Africa

Abstract: The Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) is currently carrying out detailed hydrogeological studies within the northern Sandveld area, Western Cape, South Africa. In addition, preliminary studies funded by DWAF, have also been carried out in the area assessing hydrological, ecological and botanical components. The area is receiving much attention due to its environmental uniqueness (part of the area is a Ramsar site) and its significant groundwater resources, which are being utilised for agricultura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(8 reference statements)
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous recharge estimates made by Conrad et al (2004), within the Sandveld used a GIS approach 614 that involved assigning literature estimates of recharge percentages based on MAP across the 615 catchment. In the J2000 method, physical measurements of rainfall from nearby stations are considered, 616 26 and elevation correction factors are used to assign rainfall to each HRU.…”
Section: Recharge Estimates 596mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous recharge estimates made by Conrad et al (2004), within the Sandveld used a GIS approach 614 that involved assigning literature estimates of recharge percentages based on MAP across the 615 catchment. In the J2000 method, physical measurements of rainfall from nearby stations are considered, 616 26 and elevation correction factors are used to assign rainfall to each HRU.…”
Section: Recharge Estimates 596mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches can be used to estimate recharge, but essentially 52 they can be grouped into three methods: 1) physical, for example water table fluctuation (WTF) 53 (Crosbie et al, 2005) or channel water budget (Rantz, 1982); 2) chemical, for example chloride mass 54 balance (Ting et al, 1998) or applied tracers (Forrer et al, 1999); and 3) numerical, for example 55 rainfall/runoff modelling (SWAT, Arnold et al, 2000) or variably saturated flow modelling (HYDRUS: 56 Šimůnek et al, 2012). For the physical and chemical methods, some component of climate is compared 57 to a groundwater component, for example the comparison between precipitation volume and 58 7 within the high lying areas, which are dominated by the TMG aquifer (Conrad et al, 2004), similar to 138 other high elevation regions in the Western Cape. 139…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen different methods applied to the same arid setting in Nevada, USA led to recharge estimates ranging from 1 to 100 mm/year (Flint et al 2002). A comparison of different methods to estimate recharge in another arid setting in the northern Sandveld area, Western Cape, South Africa also showed variability (Conrad et al 2004), with estimates ranging from 0.2 % to 8 % of annual rainfall as recharge. Therefore, adequate description of how recharge was calculated for the IGM-scape is critical for acceptance by others.…”
Section: Aquifer Recharge Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the area under study, due to the lack of periodic assessment of the discharge of large springs, such methods produce limitations and problems in calculation of recharge (Guardiola-Albert et al 2015). Recent years showed significant improvements in assessment methods which are in direct relation to GIS software and many researchers have used these methods (Jyrkama & Sykes 2007;Scibek & Allen 2006;Marechal et al 2006;Lee et al 2006;Samper et al 2005;Conrad et al 2004;Tapia Silva & Mora Flores 2004;Peña & Arcos 2004;Bouraoui et al 1998;Burke 1995). These methods make the calculation of groundwater recharge easier through a quicker and more concise analysis (Peña & Arcos 2004).…”
Section: Hossein Alem Akbar Esmaeilzadeh Soudejani and Saba Nahas Farmmentioning
confidence: 99%