2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11024-022-09481-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Challenge of Quantification: An Interdisciplinary Reading

Abstract: The present work looks at what we call “the multiverse of quantification”, where visible and invisible numbers permeate all aspects and venues of life. We review the contributions of different authors who focus on the roles of quantification in society, with the aim of capturing different and sometimes separate voices. Several scholars, including economists, jurists, philosophers, sociologists, communication and data scientists, express concerns or identify critical areas of our relationship with new technolog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 71 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of quantification is burgeoning with work coming from different fields of scholarship (Di Fiore et al, 2022 ; Popp Berman and Hirschman, 2018 ). Two important French schools of sociology of numbers—the so-called Foucauldian studies of quantification and the school of Economics of Convention (Desrosières, 1998 ; Mennicken and Salais, 2022 )—have led to the present movements of “statactivists” under the slogan “another number is possible” (Bruno et al, 2014a ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of quantification is burgeoning with work coming from different fields of scholarship (Di Fiore et al, 2022 ; Popp Berman and Hirschman, 2018 ). Two important French schools of sociology of numbers—the so-called Foucauldian studies of quantification and the school of Economics of Convention (Desrosières, 1998 ; Mennicken and Salais, 2022 )—have led to the present movements of “statactivists” under the slogan “another number is possible” (Bruno et al, 2014a ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%