The Challenge of CT and MRI Imaging of Obese Individuals Who Present to the Emergency Department: A National Survey

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the availability of large weight capacity computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) equipment in US hospitals with emergency departments (EDs) and to evaluate animal facilities as alternate sources of imaging. We conducted a telephone survey of radiology technicians from a random sample of all the US hospitals with EDs (n = 262) and all 136 primary hospitals of academic EDs, 145 zoos, and 28 veterinary schools. We measured the prevalence of large weight capacity (>450 lb) CT and MRI, stratified by hospital characteristics. Response rates were 94–100% across samples. Nationally, 10% (95% confidence interval, 7–15) of hospitals with EDs had large weight capacity CT and 8% (95% confidence interval, 5–13) had large weight capacity MRI. In academic hospitals, access to large capacity equipment was better for CT (28%), but similar for MRI (10%) (P < 0.001 and 0.51, respectively). Few rural (5%) and critical‐access hospitals (3%) had large capacity CT. In addition, 34% of trauma centers, 23% of stroke centers, and 21% of bariatric surgery centers of excellence had large capacity CT. Only two zoos (1%) had CT scanners; both would not image human patients. Among veterinary schools, 16 (57%) had large weight capacity CT equipment, but only 4 (14%) would consider imaging human patients. Further, 23 (82%) veterinary schools reported policies that specifically prohibited imaging humans. For patients who weigh >450 lb, access to emergent CT and MRI is limited, even at academic and bariatric surgery centers. Animal facilities are not a viable alternative for diagnostic imaging of human patients.

Risk Factors Associated with Delayed Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism

“…These data suggest that, in addition to being a risk factor for developing PE, morbid obesity complicates the diagnostic evaluation of acute PE. The body habitus associated with morbid obesity presents a unique challenge to CT scanning, and we theorize that the logistics of CT scanning may have contributed to the diagnostic delay observed in our cohort (20). A decisive physical examination is also more challenging in the morbidly obese patient, which may have complicated diagnostic evaluations.…”

Obese patients and radiography literature: what do we know about a big issue?

“…The aperture size of the gantry and table weight limits in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) must also be considered otherwise alternative arrangements to another suite/imaging facility with the appropriate wide bore equipment may be required 2425…”

The Obese Emergency Patient: Imaging Challenges and Solutions

“…In 2007, 33.8% of adults (8) and 16.9% of children in the United States were obese (9), and 68.0% of U.S. adults were overweight (8). Radiology departments are increasingly challenged in their ability to perform imaging studies with acceptable diagnostic quality in these patients (10,11). Medical imaging device manufacturers have responded by designing new products to accommodate larger patients, and some hospitals are purchasing specialized equipment and remodeling their facilities (12).…”