The challenge of applying governance and sustainable development to wildland fire management in Southern Europe

Abstract

This paper discusses participatory processes in wildland fire management (WFM). Participation is an essential element of both the European Sustainable Development (SD) Strategy and the White Paper on Governance. Governance and SD have thus become an interconnected challenge to be applied to WFM (as a sub-area in forest policy), amongst other policies. An overspread weakness in WFM is lack of real participation of stakeholders. Absence of (or deficient) participation can seriously impair contribution of this group to WFM in high-risk areas and runs counter governance and the SDS. Further, this weakness might prevent an efficient use of fire as a land management tool (prescribed burning, PB) and as a technique for fighting wildfire (suppression fire, SF). Even though these fire practices have been well known in many different places, they have been increasingly neglected or prohibited over time in Southern Europe. At present, forest and fire fighting administrations are turning their eyes back on them and analyzing the benefits of using fire in relation to preventive and suppressive actions. Therefore, participatory and diffusion mechanisms (the latter adopting the shape of national and international experts' networks) are required in order to solve the socalled fire paradox: that is, the need to move from a one-dimensional perception of the negative impacts of fire to a more sophisticated one that also stresses its positive effects. Governance, based on broad social participation, and diffusion, through fire networks, are of utmost importance in order, first, to diminish long-standing suspicion amongst different interests as to the use of fire and, secondly, to diffuse best practices associated with PB and SF. Most importantly, the EU should exercise its Foundation project: This paper has to be framed within the FIRE

Orchestrating Forest Policy in Italy: Mission Impossible?

“…At the same time enough resources have to be allocated from the beginning. In other words, the organizers should be aware that a good participatory process needs time, qualified soft-skills and money [29][30][31].…”

Wildfires in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania: Burned areas, underlying causes and management challenges

“…Studies show that government‐centred and suppression‐centric fire management strategies are not sustainable in developing countries due to shortage of resources, political interference in punishing the culprits, lack of skilled manpower, poor coordination capacity and local communities resistance to forced fire suppression (Aguilar & Montiel, 2011; Butz, 2009; Dube, 2013; Dunn et al., 2017; Kosoe et al., 2015; Mavsar et al., 2013; Paul & David, 2006; Willis, 2005). This situation is also observed in the current study where 71% of planned fire management objectives were not achieved for various reasons including a shortage of funds, lack of fire trained personnel, limited key infrastructure and inadequate personnel.…”

Forest fire and law: an analysis of Turkish forest fire legislation based on Food and Agriculture Organization criteria

“…Education and the raising of awareness are the most effective ways to prevent or reduce wrongful behaviors (Ayberk 2000;Aguilar and Montiel 2011). Enforcement of laws is also effective.…”