2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CFHTLS real time analysis system: “optically selected GRB afterglows”

Abstract: Aims. We describe a deep and wide search for optical GRB afterglows in images taken with MegaCAM at the Canada France Hawaii Telescope, within the framework of the CFHT Legacy Survey. Methods. This search is performed in near real-time thanks to a Real Time Analysis System (RTAS) called "Optically Selected GRB Afterglows", which has been installed on a dedicated computer in Hawaii. This pipeline automatically and quickly analyzes Megacam images to construct catalogs of astronomical objects, and compares catalo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They searched 490 deg 2 down to R = 22.5. They observed 25–30 deg 2 every month over a period of two to three nights (Malacrino et al 2006). Since T th ≃ 17 d, we can consider their survey a snapshot observation and we predict N oa = 0.1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They searched 490 deg 2 down to R = 22.5. They observed 25–30 deg 2 every month over a period of two to three nights (Malacrino et al 2006). Since T th ≃ 17 d, we can consider their survey a snapshot observation and we predict N oa = 0.1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since T th ≃ 17 days, we can consider their survey a snapshot observation and we predict Noa = 0.1. Recently, Malacrino et al (2007b) have rejected the only candidate they had identified in their first work.…”
Section: Opticalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other than constraining the beaming factor (Rhoads 1997;Dalal, Griest & Pruet 2002;Totani & Panaitescu 2002), some authors have focused on investigations of the detectability of orphan optical afterglows both theoretically (Nakar, Piran & Granot 2002;Totani & Panaitescu 2002) and experimentally (Hudec 2004;Becker et al 2004;Rykoff et al 2005;Malacrino & Atteia 2006;Rau, Greiner & Schwarz 2006). Becker et al (2004) give the results of a 5-year (1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)) survey of optical transients, but none was identified as an orphan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the objects of figure 1 have been carefully examined in order to determine their nature. Most of them are variable stars which are identified as such because they are present in archived astronomical images 1 , or in the USNO-B1.0 catalog (Monet et al 2003), or in images of the same field acquired during other observational periods of the CFHTLS-VWS. This last method is particularly useful for variable objects fainter than the limit of the USNO-B1.0 catalog (about 21 st mag).…”
Section: Visible Afterglow Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%