2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the detectability of optical orphan afterglows

Abstract: Aims. By neglecting sideways expansion of gamma-ray burst (GRB) jets and assuming their half-opening angle distribution, we estimate the detectability of orphan optical afterglows. Methods. This estimation is carried out by calculating the durations of off-axis optical afterglows whose flux density exceeds a certain observational limit. Results. We show that the former assumption leads to more detectable orphans, while the latter suppresses the detectability strongly compared with the model with half-opening a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nondetections of OA are in agreement with current theoretical predictions (Totani & Panaitescu 2002;Nakar et al 2002;Zou et al 2007;Rossi et al 2008;Metzger et al 2015). However, these works either extrapolated the properties of a few known GRB afterglows to the orphans (e.g., Totani & Panaitescu 2002) or assumed basic prescriptions for the known GRB population properties or for the afterglow emission model.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nondetections of OA are in agreement with current theoretical predictions (Totani & Panaitescu 2002;Nakar et al 2002;Zou et al 2007;Rossi et al 2008;Metzger et al 2015). However, these works either extrapolated the properties of a few known GRB afterglows to the orphans (e.g., Totani & Panaitescu 2002) or assumed basic prescriptions for the known GRB population properties or for the afterglow emission model.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similarly, Zou et al (2007) adopt a set of fixed physical parameters (kinetic energy and micro-physical parameters) and only allow for a possible distribution of θ jet . They predict a rate of 1.3 × 10 −2 deg −2 yr −1 for OAs brighter than R = 20, which is consistent with our findings at the corresponding flux (red solid curve in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to its unprecedented combination of depth and sky coverage which has been permitted by the large area of MegaCAM, the high throughput of the 3.6 meter CFH Telescope, the organisation of a survey adequate for visible afterglow searches, and by the implementation of dedicated software allowing a quick processing of the images and an efficient search for variable objects. If we compare our observations to theoretical predictions, the assumption that we have detected no afterglow gives an upper limit which is marginally consistent with the (optimistic) prediction of Totani & Panaitescu (2002), and fully consistent with the more pessimistic predictions of Nakar et al (2002), and Zou et al (2006). If we assume that our candidate is a real afterglow we reach a different conclusion: our data are incompatible with the predictions of Nakar et al (2002) and Zou et al (2006) at the 90% confidence level.…”
Section: Constraining Grb Beamingsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…If we compare our observations to theoretical predictions, the assumption that we have detected no afterglow gives an upper limit which is marginally consistent with the (optimistic) prediction of Totani & Panaitescu (2002), and fully consistent with the more pessimistic predictions of Nakar et al (2002), and Zou et al (2006). If we assume that our candidate is a real afterglow we reach a different conclusion: our data are incompatible with the predictions of Nakar et al (2002) and Zou et al (2006) at the 90% confidence level. More importantly, if OT 20050728 is a true GRB afterglow, our work is the first one to provide Table 2. an estimate of the amount of observing time needed to detect a significant number of GRB visible afterglows.…”
Section: Constraining Grb Beamingsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Up until today the quest for their discovery has resulted in upper (θ jet ∼ < 22 • Levinson et al 2002) or lower (θ jet ∼ > 0.8 • Soderberg et al 2006b) limits on the GRB opening angles. Some peculiar transients in past surveys could have been genuine OAs both in the optical (Rau et al 2006;Zou et al 2007;Malacrino et al 2007) and radio (for a recent reveiw on blind surveys see Murphy et al 2013) regime, but none have been confirmed so far. The evolution of the OA lightcurve differs from that of a normal afterglow before reaching its peak flux.…”
Section: Pos(aaska14)052mentioning
confidence: 99%