2010
DOI: 10.2202/1469-3569.1319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Causes and Consequences of Private Food Governance

Abstract: This paper investigates the creation and consequences of private regulation in global food governance. It points to the power to govern and the authority to govern as the two crucial conditions for the emergence and diffusion of private food regulation. More specifically, the paper argues that the power to govern is a function of the structural power of agrifood corporations, particularly retail food corporations in our case. The authority to govern is a function of the perceived legitimacy of retail food corp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the insights gained from these approaches that consider governance as arising from the interaction among actors include the following: (a) power relations are key to the capacity of players to drive sustainability initiatives [57,64,65]; (b) the alignment of business interests along the supply chain enables sustainability initiatives while misalignment obstructs [31,43,66]; (c) ecolabelling has had the effect of disadvantaging smaller producers, especially the poor in the global South [6,[67][68][69]; (d) evaluating the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities is an important new research frontier [56,68,70]; and (e) ecolabels alone are not enough to address the sustainability challenges brought about by global industrial production [71]. Notwithstanding the value of these insights, none of these bodies of work address our questions about the role of consumers in sustainability movements.…”
Section: Whose Choice: Consumer or Retailer?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the insights gained from these approaches that consider governance as arising from the interaction among actors include the following: (a) power relations are key to the capacity of players to drive sustainability initiatives [57,64,65]; (b) the alignment of business interests along the supply chain enables sustainability initiatives while misalignment obstructs [31,43,66]; (c) ecolabelling has had the effect of disadvantaging smaller producers, especially the poor in the global South [6,[67][68][69]; (d) evaluating the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities is an important new research frontier [56,68,70]; and (e) ecolabels alone are not enough to address the sustainability challenges brought about by global industrial production [71]. Notwithstanding the value of these insights, none of these bodies of work address our questions about the role of consumers in sustainability movements.…”
Section: Whose Choice: Consumer or Retailer?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Governmental, intergovernmental and private institutions introduced health and safety standards. In the 1990s, a second category of sustainability standards emerged, aiming to regulate the environmental and social conditions of food production, while securing economic viability (Fuchs and Kalfagianni 2010;Fuchs et al 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…could constitute a pertinent biological or murine model for scientific development. Producers, consumers and policy makers should take into consideration health and safety as well as sustainability standards developed by governmental, intergovernmental and private institutions to regulate the environmental and social conditions of production, while securing economic viability (Fuchs & Kalfagianni, 2010;Fuchs et al, 2011;Kurth & Glasbergen, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%