2014
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Case of Anders Behring Breivik – Language of a Lone Terrorist

Abstract: Anders Behring Breivik carried out a massacre in Norway on July 22, 2011, killing a total 77 persons and leaving 42 others severely wounded. He detonated a bomb in Oslo and then drove to the island of Utøya, where he shot and killed youngsters gathered at a youth camp. The authors performed an analysis of Breivik's writing style in his extensive manifesto which he published hours before the attacks, and also referred to the two psychiatrists' reports. The first report concluded that he suffered from paranoid s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1425, 1458). Breivik clearly identified himself as an agent to advance a particular cause or belief system : a resistance fighter against multiculturalism, Marxism, and the Islamization of Europe (Leonard, Annas, Knoll, & Torrissen, ).…”
Section: Methods and Case Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1425, 1458). Breivik clearly identified himself as an agent to advance a particular cause or belief system : a resistance fighter against multiculturalism, Marxism, and the Islamization of Europe (Leonard, Annas, Knoll, & Torrissen, ).…”
Section: Methods and Case Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, two psychiatric evaluators initially opined that he had paranoid schizophrenia (Sorheim & Husby, 2011), whereas two subsequent psychiatric evaluators opined that he did not have schizophrenia but instead had a severe personality disorder (Torrissen & Aspaas, 2012). These differences of opinion were recently investigated in the context of the insanity defense in Norway in two studies (Melle, 2013; Roth & Dager, 2014), and a third utilized forensic linguistic analysis to understand his psychopathology (Leonard, Annas, Knoll, & Tørrissen, 2014). The forensic psychiatrists in the Breivik trial, moreover, were only asked to determine his criminal responsibility after his crimes, which, in Norwegian law, is solely based upon the rendered diagnosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As disconcerting as it may seem, the threat to society is, in the case of Breivik and many others, a creation of that society, a symptom of its own maladies, spill-over from its excesses, penury from its insufficiencies. From a societal point of view, that is, setting aside the relatively extraordinary personal psychological situation that surrounded Breivik during his upbringing and youth (Berntzen and Sandberg, 2014;Leonard et al, 2014;Melle, 2013), Breivik is a product of Norwegian society, its culture, welfare, values, religion, and customs. He benefited in his misdeeds from the social conventions, political liberties, and legal permissiveness enjoyed by any modern liberal society, but most markedly the Norwegian.…”
Section: Homegrown Insecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%