The case for regulating intragenic GMOs

Abstract

This paper discusses the ethical and regulatory issues raised by ''intragenics'' -organisms that have been genetically modified using gene technologies, but that do not contain DNA from another species. Considering the rapid development of knowledge about gene regulation and genomics, we anticipate rapid advances in intragenic methods. Of regulatory systems developed to govern genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, the Australian system stands out in explicitly excluding intragenics from regulation. European systems are also under pressure to exclude intragenics from regulation. We evaluate recent arguments that intragenics are safer and more morally acceptable than transgenic organisms, and more acceptable to the public, which might be thought to justify a lower standard of regulation. We argue that the exemption of intragenics from regulation is not justified, and that there may be significant environmental risks associated with them. We conclude that intragenics should be subject to the same standard of regulation as other GMOs.

Enhancing innovation in agriculture at the policy level: The potential contribution of Technology Assessment

“…In the past two decades, the primary concern was with biotechnology (e.g. Bhargava, 2006;Wickson, 2007;Russell, 2008;Russell and Sparrow, 2008). Recently, there has been much concern about the social issues associated with nanotechnology (Grunwald, 2005;Macnaghten et al, 2005;Bennet and Sarewitz, 2006;Swierstra and Rip, 2007), and in fact a new field and journal, NanoEthics, has been created.…”

Not As They Seem

“…There is considerable debate about whether cisgenesis really presents less risk than transgenesis, but the Australian government has already excluded cisgenics from the regulatory protocol that is applied to transgenics (37). Except for possible insertional effects, it is easy to accept the assertion that transformation of one line of a species with a gene or genes from another line of the same species is the equivalent, for regulatory purposes, of introgressing that gene by conventional crosses.…”

Cisgenesis Does Not Solve the Late Blight Problem of Organic Potato Production: Alternative Breeding Strategies

“…A cisgenesis product is a transformed plant that only contains genes that are innate to the species or to a small group of crossable species. This adds a new dimension to the debate on GMO (Nielsen 2003;COGEM 2006;Lusk and Rozan 2006;Myskja 2006;Russell and Sparrow 2008). When definitions of genetic modification in regulations are merely product-based then for some groups in society there are fewer arguments against cisgenic plants, e.g.…”