1992
DOI: 10.2307/977173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Case for Performance Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stakeholder satisfaction could be improved by establishing agreements about public organizations' strategic goals and objectives (Wholey, 1999) and transparent performance information systems for evaluating how well governments achieve these goals. In other words, citizens' engagement in governmental decision-making and access to performance information can enhance their trust in democratic governance (Ho & Coates, 2004;Kelly & Swindell, 2002;Wholey & Hatry, 1992;Yang & Holzer, 2006).…”
Section: Theoretical Hypotheses About Stakeholder Participation In Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholder satisfaction could be improved by establishing agreements about public organizations' strategic goals and objectives (Wholey, 1999) and transparent performance information systems for evaluating how well governments achieve these goals. In other words, citizens' engagement in governmental decision-making and access to performance information can enhance their trust in democratic governance (Ho & Coates, 2004;Kelly & Swindell, 2002;Wholey & Hatry, 1992;Yang & Holzer, 2006).…”
Section: Theoretical Hypotheses About Stakeholder Participation In Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…121), public (government) institutions (i.e. institutions that are not directly involved in a competitive market [30]), and market performance with respect to market power and abuse in decentralised energy markets [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to multidimensional indicators (Hajiran, 2006), medical care contributes substantially in improving QoL (Glimelius et al, 1996;Van den Berg et al, 2005) especially in tertiary care. On the other hand, Wholey and Hatry (1992) argued that few government agencies provide timely information on the quality and outcomes of their major programme. Practically, the achieved results are outcomes measurements revealing how often patients are harmed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%