1975
DOI: 10.1145/382218.382478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The case for B3—a reply to Waxman

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there has been an ongoing debate on B3 in the SIGCSE Bulletin [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, there has been an ongoing debate on B3 in the SIGCSE Bulletin [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest contributors to the debate take positions about as far apart as can be taken: Waxman [13] suggests that B3 be abolished; Prather [14] and Korfhage [15] would have us follow Curriculum 68 recommendations with little change. So great a difference of opinion should not exist after eight years of experimentation with Curriculum 68.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%