The case against prisons 1

Anderson, Jordan; Black, Andrea; Maclaurin, Emmet; Mead, Tania Sawicki

doi:10.4324/9780429425035-7

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For people struggling with addiction, lack of education, poor health or unemployment, prison programmes could be seen to offer people the help they need. However, studies of in-prison rehabilitation programmes in Aotearoa New Zealand and abroad have consistently shown that community-based rehabilitation is substantially more effective (Anderson et al 2018). Where rehabilitation aims to reduce the use of violence as a response to problems, Aotearoa New Zealand health researchers argue "prison culture is recognised as encouraging prisoners to adapt in ways that are more harmful than helpful (i.e.…”

Section: What Is Prison Abolition?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In other words, only a small proportion of incidents came to the attention of authorities, substantially limiting the ability of the state to punish and deter. Moreover, even if every victimisation led to punishment, an actual experience of imprisonment fails to deter future criminalised activity (Anderson et al 2018). Of the approximately 7,000 people sentenced to imprisonment each year in Aotearoa New Zealand (Shannon 2019), 43.2 per cent of people released from prison are reimprisoned within two years (Department of Corrections 2018).…”

Section: Deterrencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Feminist prison abolitionism

Lamusse¹

2021

Women, Crime and Justice in Context

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reform) in Sweden in 1966, and the publication of Thomas Mathiesen's (1974) Politics of Abolition. In Aotearoa New Zealand, the abolitionist group Movement Against Prisons (MAP) NZ formed in the early 1970s and continued until the late 2000s to advocate for abolition and, later, reform of prisons. However, contemporary prison abolitionism is arguably most influenced by the work of the Black Marxist feminist Angela Davis, particularly her book Are prisons obsolete? (Davis 2003). The influence of Davis is felt beyond the United States and is explicitly acknowledged as key to the formation of the prison abolitionist organisation People Against Prisons Aotearoa (Lamusse 2020). Davis also speaks at every biannual conference in Australia of the feminist prison abolitionist organisation Sisters Inside.Although its meaning is contested by abolitionist scholars and activists, prison abolitionism can generally be taken to mean the moral, political and criminological project that seeks the end of prisons. For some, abolition simply means the end of prisons as the main form of punishment, while, for others, abolition involves the creation of an entirely different society in which prisons are impossible to imagine (Davis , 2014. Indeed, for these abolitionists, abolition is about more than getting rid of prisons. Prisons are a tool for the reproduction of colonisation, capitalism, racism, patriarchy and other forms of oppression, but those forms of oppression are not limited to imprisonment. From this perspective, abolitionism "is based on economic and social justice for all, concern for all victims, and reconciliation within a caring community" (Knopp et al. 1976, p. 7). With this in mind, abolition is a long-term strategy to not only close down prisons but also create social and economic conditions that encourage empowerment, healing and reciprocity.Prison abolitionism can be contrasted with prison reformism. While both abolitionists and reformers see prisons as flawed and often violent institutions, reformers argue that they can be improved to become more humane, rehabilitative or effective. On the other hand, abolitionists argue that prisons are fundamentally inhumane and violent institutions that reproduce suffering and oppression. In other words, prison reformers seek to improve prisons, while abolitionists aim to end them.Understanding this distinction between reformism and abolitionism leads us to ask why abolitionists argue that prisons are fundamentally flawed? Lamusse and McIntosh (2020) argue there are "pragmatic," criminological arguments for abolition, as well as moral and political ones. The rest of this section discusses the pragmatic reasons for abolition, while the next section discusses the moral and political reasons.The pragmatic reasoning for abolition assesses prisons according to the standards of their supposed purposes of rehabilitation, safety, deterrence, and justice for victims. Abolitionists argue that imprisonment not only fails to achieve each of these purposes, but also ultimately entrenches in...

show abstract

Section: What Is Prison Abolition?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Deterrencementioning

confidence: 99%