The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4191450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Carbon Footprint of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: It is Time for Sustainable Endoscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the striking findings is that patient and staff transport accounted for 45 % of the carbon footprint [9], above previously reported healthcare data. This percentage would likely be lower if the study were conducted in a better-connected hospital.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the striking findings is that patient and staff transport accounted for 45 % of the carbon footprint [9], above previously reported healthcare data. This percentage would likely be lower if the study were conducted in a better-connected hospital.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In this issue of Endoscopy, Lacroute et al [9] present the results of a retrospective study conducted in 2021 in an ambulatory GI endoscopy center. A total of 8524 procedures were performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Apart from this, elective endoscopic procedures should be performed on an outpatient basis, as inpatient procedures were shown to incur higher carbon emissions. 19 Because human travel accounts for 45% of GHG emissions of ambulatory endoscopy, 8 simple measures like combining upper and lower endoscopy on the same day may also result in a remarkable carbon reduction. Intuitively, though the use of non-invasive diagnostic modalities (e.g., fecal calprotectin and urea breath test) instead of endoscopy may reduce carbon footprint, only 60% of our participants agreed on that and their environmental benefit should not be assumed due to a lack of comparative evidence on their carbon footprint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study estimated a carbon footprint of 28.4 kg CO 2 e for each endoscopy procedure, with the source of emission in descending order being human travel, equipment, energy consumption, consumables, and waste disposal. 8 This juxtaposition of healthcare delivery and environmental impact presents a crucial challenge that must be addressed. Without intervention, the ecological footprint of endoscopy services could become unsustainable in the near future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the GHG emission class of medical and non-medical equipment, endoscopy specific materials accounted for 98% of emissions. 6 There is now increased awareness of how healthcare can aggravate climate change, and acceptance of the need for the healthcare sector to take steps to reduce its environmental footprint. The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) have published their strategy for climate change and sustainability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%