“…One of the striking findings is that patient and staff transport accounted for 45 % of the carbon footprint [9], above previously reported healthcare data. This percentage would likely be lower if the study were conducted in a better-connected hospital.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In this issue of Endoscopy, Lacroute et al [9] present the results of a retrospective study conducted in 2021 in an ambulatory GI endoscopy center. A total of 8524 procedures were performed.…”
“…One of the striking findings is that patient and staff transport accounted for 45 % of the carbon footprint [9], above previously reported healthcare data. This percentage would likely be lower if the study were conducted in a better-connected hospital.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In this issue of Endoscopy, Lacroute et al [9] present the results of a retrospective study conducted in 2021 in an ambulatory GI endoscopy center. A total of 8524 procedures were performed.…”
“…17,18 Apart from this, elective endoscopic procedures should be performed on an outpatient basis, as inpatient procedures were shown to incur higher carbon emissions. 19 Because human travel accounts for 45% of GHG emissions of ambulatory endoscopy, 8 simple measures like combining upper and lower endoscopy on the same day may also result in a remarkable carbon reduction. Intuitively, though the use of non-invasive diagnostic modalities (e.g., fecal calprotectin and urea breath test) instead of endoscopy may reduce carbon footprint, only 60% of our participants agreed on that and their environmental benefit should not be assumed due to a lack of comparative evidence on their carbon footprint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study estimated a carbon footprint of 28.4 kg CO 2 e for each endoscopy procedure, with the source of emission in descending order being human travel, equipment, energy consumption, consumables, and waste disposal. 8 This juxtaposition of healthcare delivery and environmental impact presents a crucial challenge that must be addressed. Without intervention, the ecological footprint of endoscopy services could become unsustainable in the near future.…”
Background and AimGreenhouse gas emissions are the fundamental cause of global warming, with CO2 being the most contributive. Carbon reduction has been widely advocated to mitigate the climate crisis. The endoscopy unit is the third highest waste‐generating department in a hospital. The awareness and acceptance of the practice of green endoscopy among healthcare workers is unclear.MethodAn online survey was conducted over a 5‐week period from July to August 2023 in the Asia‐Pacific region, which targeted endoscopists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals of the endoscopy unit. The primary outcome was the agreement to adopt green endoscopy. The secondary outcomes included views on sustainable practices, factors associated with increased acceptance of green endoscopy, the acceptance of different carbon reduction measures, and the perceived barriers to implementation.ResultsA total of 259 valid responses were received. Overall, 79.5% of participants agreed to incorporate green endoscopy into their practice. Nevertheless, existing green policies were only reported by 12.7% of respondents. The level of understanding of green endoscopy is the only significant factor associated with its acceptance (odds ratio 3.10, P < 0.007). Potential barriers to implementation include healthcare cost increment, infection risk, inadequate awareness, and lack of policy and industrial support.ConclusionGreen endoscopy is well accepted among healthcare workers but not widely implemented. The level of understanding is highly associated with its acceptance, highlighting the importance of education. A reliable assessment tool is needed to quantify the environmental impact of endoscopy. Further studies are needed to ascertain its benefit and cost effectiveness.
“…Within the GHG emission class of medical and non-medical equipment, endoscopy specific materials accounted for 98% of emissions. 6 There is now increased awareness of how healthcare can aggravate climate change, and acceptance of the need for the healthcare sector to take steps to reduce its environmental footprint. The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) have published their strategy for climate change and sustainability.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.