2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11055-019-00862-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Burden of Migraine in Real Clinical Practice: Clinical and Economic Aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On patient-reported outcomes, mean HIT-6 scores at baseline ranged from a mean of 61.2 (SD not reported) (84) 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On patient-reported outcomes, mean HIT-6 scores at baseline ranged from a mean of 61.2 (SD not reported) (84) 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On patient-reported outcomes, mean HIT-6 scores at baseline ranged from a mean of 61.2 (SD not reported) (84) to a mean of 72.1 (±6.0) (85) (Supplementary Table 4). Mean baseline MSQ scores for role-function restrictive domain ranged from 36.2 (±17.8) (86) to 36.7 (SD not reported) (87).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reduction from baseline in monthly headache days and monthly migraine days at all time points was statistically significant with all interventions. A single study [ 27 ] comparing onabotulinumtoxinA with topiramate (NOS quality rating, 5/9) reported that patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA had significantly fewer monthly headache days compared with topiramate at 3 months (13.8 days versus 14.9 days, p < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduction in HIT-6 score from baseline was statistically significant at all time points for all interventions. The single study comparing onabotulinumtoxinA with topiramate (NOS quality rating, 5/9) reported that patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA had a significantly lower score on the HIT-6 scale compared with topiramate at 3 months (39.5 versus 43.2; p < 0.05) [ 27 ]. The abstract comparing onabotulinumtoxinA and multiple CGRP mAbs (NOS quality rating, N/A) showed that 35.0% of those treated with onabotulinumtoxinA and 44.0% of those treated with multiple CGRP mAbs experienced at least one severity class improvement according to HIT-6 score at 1 year; this difference was not significant [ 16 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%