The Broadcasters’ Perspective

Silk, Michael; Morgan, Haydn

doi:10.4324/9780203798386-17

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While the host countries are keen about good publicity, the reporting media might also search for well-selling scandals and negative headlines to achieve widespread attention and to sell their content (Curi et al, 2011). In addition, the television industry needs advertisements to finance the large amounts of money spent on purchasing the broadcasting rights (Silk and Morgan, 2015). The higher the viewing figures, the more attractive it is for businesses to advertise during the broadcasting.…”

Section: Sport Mega Events: Stakeholders and Their Interestsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coping with dilemma: How German sport media users respond to sport mega events in autocratic countries

Flemming

Lünich

Marcinkowski

et al. 2016

International Review for the Sociology of Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, sport mega events have been frequently awarded to autocratic countries whose regimes violate democratic values and human rights. Based on the theory of cognitive dissonance, we assume that this is a potential source of internal conflict for viewers, especially for sports enthusiasts and politically aware recipients. Special attention rests on the consequences of the recipients' strategies of addressing this predicament for important stakeholders of these events, namely the reporting media, the host country and sponsors. We conducted an online survey among 711 German respondents to examine how recipients cope with this dilemma using the forthcoming FIFA soccer World Cup 2018 in Russia as an example. Our results show that while recipients are strongly interested in soccer and politics, most of them do not necessarily perceive these two spheres as inextricably connected. Their awareness of sociopolitical issues in the context of sport events-and thus the decisive factor to explain cognitive dissonance-is arguably low. Still, when recipients experience cognitive dissonance they rely on certain strategies to reduce or avoid dissonance. They do not elude this dilemma by preferring sports broadcasting without coverage of the event's negative circumstances, but are actually willing to pass on parts of the tournament. They also do not denigrate the credibility of the media or emphasize positive aspects of the host country Russia. In fact, the recipients would prefer if the World Cup had not been awarded to Russia in the first place. However, respondents experiencing cognitive dissonance are also more likely to engage in political consumerism, by deliberately deciding against or in favor of products and sponsors depending on whether or not those are associated with the event.

show abstract

Section: Sport Mega Events: Stakeholders and Their Interestsmentioning

confidence: 99%