2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2008000100022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Brazilian version of the effort-reward imbalance questionnaire to assess job stress

Abstract: The effort-reward imbalance (ERI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
20

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
66
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Coeffi cients higher than one indicate high effort with low reward, classifi ed as inadequate. 5 The SF-36 is a generic questionnaire on HRQL from a multi-dimensional construct. It consists of 36 items or questions which represent eight health dimensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coeffi cients higher than one indicate high effort with low reward, classifi ed as inadequate. 5 The SF-36 is a generic questionnaire on HRQL from a multi-dimensional construct. It consists of 36 items or questions which represent eight health dimensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cronbach's alpha value for extrinsic effort is 0.68, for job reward is 0.78 and for over-commitment 0.78. (17) Balance between effort and reward is given by the index (Σ E÷[Σ R x c]), where E = extrinsic effort and R= reward multiplied by the correction factor (c=0.545455). As a result, the values lower or equal to 1, indicate balance between effort and reward, while values higher than 1 indicate imbalance condition between effort and reward.…”
Section: Effort-reward Imbalance (Eri)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such findings would underline the evolutionary old 'grammar' of social exchange that may be rooted in distinct structures of the human brain (Cosmides and Tooby, 1992). Currently, a number of findings from observational studies confirm that effortreward imbalance at work is associated with elevated risks of stress-related disorders in Japanese (Tsutsumi et al, 2001), Chinese (Xu et al, 2004;Li et al, 2005), South Korean (Eum et al, 2007), Thay (Buapetch et al, 2008) and Brazilian (Chor et al, 2007) working populations, thus lending support to the idea that the experience of unfair exchange results in negative emotions and adverse well-being cross-culturally in similar ways. This discovery is of interest in view of the process of economic globalisation and associated trans-national labour market mobility.…”
Section: Brief Summary Of Empirical Evidence On Health-adverse Effectsmentioning
confidence: 86%