“…Reflections in this sense about authoritarian and antidemocratic leaderships, however, still remain in their infancy in Administration, but they are old (and continue to grow and be relevant) in other areas of knowledge, especially in political science (Frantz & Ezrow, 2011;Decker, Rothe, Weissmann, Kiess, & Brähler, 2013;Levitsky & Ziblatt, 2018;Runciman, 2018), in sociology (Aho, 2020;Pascale, 2019;Solt, 2012), and in history (Finchelstein, 2017;Moore Jr., 1966;Rollemberg & Quadrat, 2011); in the latter, the body of literature is so vast that it is unviable to adequately cite it. Fields such as economics (De Luca, Litina, & Sekeris, 2015;Vasilyeva & Libman, 2020), law (Acunha, Arafa, & Benvindo, 2018;Ginsburg & Moustafa, 2008), and psychology (Napier & Jost, 2008) have also demonstrated a growing interest in this discussion. Even in more distant areas, such as biology, studies have emerged that compare different ways of obtaining cooperation in the leader-followers relationship in groups (Hooper, Kaplan, & Boone, 2010;King, Johnson, & Van Vugt, 2009;Van Vugt & Von Rueden, 2018).…”