The boundary spanning of managers within service networks

Abstract

a b s t r a c tThis research examines how managers act as a boundary spanner in two types of boundary-spanning relationships and how their boundary-spanning activities provide support for customer value creation in service networks. Using an embedded case design in three shopping centers, the results from interviews with retail store managers and shopping center managers indicate that store managers span boundaries between both the parent organization and the shopping center and between the shopping center and customers. Analysis reveals six types of boundaryspanning activities. Four serve to represent the organization (service delivery, coordination, guarding, and external communication), while two are informational in nature (outbound information collection and relay, and inbound information collection and relay). This research highlights the wide range of activities a manager can undertake to improve the competitiveness of a company and service network by enhancing customer value.

Adaptive resilience and the competition between retail and service agglomeration formats: an international perspective

“…Independent of the agglomeration format, the reason why retail and service organisations locate stores within agglomerations, and why consumers patronise them, lies in their generic nature as networks, which produce synergies and encourage collaborations due to the retail and service stores' close proximity to one another (Knoben and Oerlemans, 2006). The network view provides a useful vehicle for conceptualising the interplay between stores (e.g., Alexander et al, 2016); thus, it can help to identify those network resources of each specific format that might possibly create competitive advantages.…”

Functional leadership in interteam contexts: Understanding ‘what’ in the context of why? where? when? and who?

“…Qualitative System Adler and colleagues identified managerial challenges in cross-boundary projects including: securing sustained funding, securing resources for administration, dual demands on personnel time, difficulties in informal social influence, and differences in priorities across teams. Alexander et al (2016) Qualitative System Through representational and informational boundary spanning activities with various external stakeholders, store managers may improve system performance and the organizational environment. Alter (1990) Mixed Methods…”

Three types of organizational boundary spanning: Predicting CSR policy extensiveness among global consumer products companies

“…Research has long recognized that boundary spanning occurs within organizations (e.g., Alexander, Teller, & Roggeveen, ; Teigland & Wasklo, ). Sub‐unit spanning, more specifically, refers to the spread of organizations across multiple units that fall under a single formal organizational structure, such as subsidiaries, branches, and franchises (Daft, ; Kang, ; Simon, ).…”