2022
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00208-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Boston criteria version 2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a multicentre, retrospective, MRI–neuropathology diagnostic accuracy study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
177
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
177
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…: lobar, non-lobar or mixed 90 . The former is associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy, quantifiable by the Boston Criteria, 91 later extended to other patterns as in chronic hypertensive encephalopathy 55,56 (figs 5 and 7).…”
Section: Acute On Chronic Encephalopathymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…: lobar, non-lobar or mixed 90 . The former is associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy, quantifiable by the Boston Criteria, 91 later extended to other patterns as in chronic hypertensive encephalopathy 55,56 (figs 5 and 7).…”
Section: Acute On Chronic Encephalopathymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Further, we chose to compare FDD to CAA+ cases and not AD, since those patients show pronounced CAA pathology without parenchymal plaques, similar to the pathology observed in FDD. There is increased recognition of the wide spectrum of clinical manifestations of sporadic CAA and the role it plays in age‐related cognitive impairment, both in association with and independently of AD, highlighting the importance of better understanding the molecular mechanisms that underlie it (Banerjee et al, 2017; Charidimou et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in the definition of a <<possible CAA>> diagnosis, we took into account the presence of at least one other CAA-related white matter lesion (CSO-PVS or WMH-MS). As suggested by the new Boston Criteria v2.0 [ 43 ], this MRI finding, together with the hemorrhagic marker of a single sICH, in the absence of any deep hemorrhagic lesions and other cause of hemorrhagic lesions, was defined as a <<probable CAA>>, improving sensitivity and providing overall superior diagnostic accuracy [ 43 ]. Numerous rectifications of misdiagnosis have been required to calculate a reliable prevalence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%