1999
DOI: 10.1017/s0963926899000152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The blitz, civilian morale and the city: mass-observation and working-class culture in Britain, 1940–41

Abstract: One of the most difficult concepts in both contemporary and academic accounts of the Second World War is that of civilian morale. This paper uses evidence from the Mass-Observation Archive to argue that understanding fluctuations in morale can only be understood through an exploration of working-class culture during the 1930s and 1940s. The paper examines difficulties of defining ‘morale’ and goes on to argue that the pattern of bombing in urban centres and the continuity of working-class institutions helped s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, as now, societal recognition or understanding of the war experience was not generally available to the returning World War II veterans and, consequently, many suffered significant difficulties readjusting to civilian society. Those who lived in the war zones such as Britain, Europe, Southern Asia, or the Pacific (Beaven & Griffiths, 1999;den Velde, Deeg, Hovens, Van Duijn, & Aarts, 2011;Kuwert, Spitzer, Trader, Freyberger, & Ermann, 2007) experienced the full horror of war, whereas people in North America, Southern Africa, Australia, and New Zealand were largely protected from the war by geography and politics, and often did not understand this intensity of trauma. Where possible, veterans turned to their comrades from the war and veteran's associations to help them cope with their wartime experiences and process traumatic memories (Hunt & Robbins, 2001b).…”
Section: Discussion and Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, as now, societal recognition or understanding of the war experience was not generally available to the returning World War II veterans and, consequently, many suffered significant difficulties readjusting to civilian society. Those who lived in the war zones such as Britain, Europe, Southern Asia, or the Pacific (Beaven & Griffiths, 1999;den Velde, Deeg, Hovens, Van Duijn, & Aarts, 2011;Kuwert, Spitzer, Trader, Freyberger, & Ermann, 2007) experienced the full horror of war, whereas people in North America, Southern Africa, Australia, and New Zealand were largely protected from the war by geography and politics, and often did not understand this intensity of trauma. Where possible, veterans turned to their comrades from the war and veteran's associations to help them cope with their wartime experiences and process traumatic memories (Hunt & Robbins, 2001b).…”
Section: Discussion and Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With some it ended before it began, in ignominy: in the months before the outbreak of war gas masks became a favourite souvenir of the Munich Crisis for American tourists to take home with them. While the proportion of the population carrying their gas masks in the street never rose above approximately 75 percent, anxious Home Office officials monitored changing attitudes and practices of gas protection in the general public through the Mass Observation data gathering project (Beaven and Griffiths 1999;Harrisson 1976). At the time of the evacuation of the British army from Dunkirk in 1940, the percentage of the population carrying gas masks in the street rose from practically zero to around 30 percent; by August 1940 it had fallen to just ten percent (Calder 1992: 112).…”
Section: Disposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The government was keenly aware of the fluctuating proportion of the population who carried gas masks on the street, and may have sought to encourage greater diligence. These data came from the plethora of overt and covert surveys of civilian morale in the early stages of the war, in which the public carriage of respirators was treated as an indicator of the fear of imminent attack (Beaven & Griffiths 1999).…”
Section: Live Gas Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With some it ended before it began, in ignominy: in the months before the outbreak of war, gas masks became a favourite souvenir of the Munich Crisis for American tourists to take home with them (Hibbs 2009). While the proportion of the population carrying their gas masks in the street never rose above approximately 75 per cent, anxious Home Office officials monitored changing attitudes and practices of gas protection in the general public through the Mass Observation project, a pioneering combination of market research and ethnography in Britain from the 1930s onwards (Beaven & Griffiths 1999; Harrisson 1976). At the time of the evacuation of the British army from Dunkirk in 1940 the percentage of the population carrying gas masks in the street rose from practically zero to around 30 per cent; by August 1940 it had fallen to just 10 per cent (Calder 1992: 112).…”
Section: Disposalmentioning
confidence: 99%