1954
DOI: 10.2307/1948466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bivouac or Temporary Nest as an Adaptive Factor in Certain Terrestrial Species of Army Ants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

1957
1957
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The bivouac in the statary phase is more frequently sheltered (i.e., entirely hidden within a hollow log, mammal burrow, etc.) than in the nomadic phase (Schneirla et al, 1954).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The bivouac in the statary phase is more frequently sheltered (i.e., entirely hidden within a hollow log, mammal burrow, etc.) than in the nomadic phase (Schneirla et al, 1954).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Instead, army ants use their bodies to form a living nest or bivouac without the manipulation of foreign materials (Schneirla et al, 1954). Most army ant species are hypogaeic, nesting and foraging underground, but the swarm-raiding army ant Eciton burchellii forages above ground (Hölldobler and Wilson, 1990;Gotwald, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A third possibility is that ant-following birds may simply choose areas where ants are active. Army ants are particularly sensitive to low humidity and high temperatures (Schneirla et al 1954) and this may generate correlations between physical factors and ant bird activity, independent of physiological limitation on the birds themselves, but still determined on a very local scale. The scale of measurement of temperature and canopy cover in this study suggests a scale on the order of 35 m. Multiple mechanisms may operate to influence habitat use by ant-following birds, as suggested by the statistical relationship of both local environmental factors and primary forest cover to the species richness of ant followers.…”
Section: Potential Influences On Avian Species Richness Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, colony attributes such as nest form, the way of its construction, and its internal conditions were studied mainly for army ant species which form epigaeic bivouacs (e.g. Beebe, 1919;Schneirla et al, 1954;Jackson, 1957;Rettenmeyer, 1963;Chapman, 1964;Schneirla and Reyes, 1969;Schneirla, 1971). Such epigaeic bivouacs, which are formed by a variety of Ecitoninae and Aenictinae species, are constructed wholly of the bodies of colony members.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%