2015
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muv034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bite of Administrative Burden: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation

Abstract: The study of administrative burden-experienced in individual encounters with government-is being renewed with new theoretical developments and policy applications. Building on recent developments, this article aims to broaden the conceptual framing of administrative burden and extend its empirical investigation beyond concerns about access to and efficiency of public services to questions of individual and societal impacts. It also expands beyond the typical US or developed country context to examine this phen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
121
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
121
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Latin American bureaucracies are notorious for their inefficiency and opacity, yet there is very little empirical research done on what exactly constitutes the "bureau- Most of what we know about administrative burdens comes from studies conducted in the United States and Western Europe (Moynihan & Herd, 2010). The few studies on the administrative burdens citizens in developing countries face suggest that the bite of these burdens is even higher there (Heinrich, 2016;cf. Dasandi & Esteve, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Latin American bureaucracies are notorious for their inefficiency and opacity, yet there is very little empirical research done on what exactly constitutes the "bureau- Most of what we know about administrative burdens comes from studies conducted in the United States and Western Europe (Moynihan & Herd, 2010). The few studies on the administrative burdens citizens in developing countries face suggest that the bite of these burdens is even higher there (Heinrich, 2016;cf. Dasandi & Esteve, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we argue that burdens can also be explained by more systemic elements in public administration, such as policy paradigms, organisational design, organisational capacity, information technology, historical legacies, and traditions (Cesarini & Hite, ; Painter & Peters, ; de Jong, ; Heinrich, , p. 406). In this article, we propose to look at the structural characteristics of the Mexican administrative context, which creates important behavioural incentives and disincentives that affect administrative burdens.…”
Section: Administrative Burdens and Their Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A lack of resources for implementing and enforcing the many provisions under these laws is just one of a number of factors that may make the actual implementation and enforcement of immigration policies highly dependent on the discretion of a variety of actors or stakeholders involved (Motomura, ). Figure , adapted from Heinrich () and Kahn, Katz, and Gutek (), illustrates four quadrants or categories of administrative burden with encounters or interactions stemming from some of the most common provisions of recent legislative and policy actions directed toward immigrants, including examples (in italics) specific to the case study presented here.…”
Section: Administrative Burden As a Tool Of Immigration Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature in public management on the troublesome administrative aspects of public programs, or what Heinrich (2016) refers to as the bite of administrative burden, can inform subsidy instability research. Research documents the frustration induced by bureaucratic encounters and efforts to navigate the application process of welfare programs such as TANF and other means-tested programs (Soss 1999(Soss , 2000Moynihan, Herd, and Rigby 2016).…”
Section: Program Rules and Administration As Contributors To Subsidy mentioning
confidence: 99%