1948
DOI: 10.1093/jn/35.2.257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Biological Value of the Protein of Field Pea Products with a Comparison of Several Methods used for This Determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1951
1951
1967
1967

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biological values and true digestibilities recorded for casein by the balance-sheet method are 66 and 99 (465), 80 and 101(466), 79 and 84(467) and 72 (biological value) (426), all with growing rats at an 8-10 % level of protein intake, and biological values of 63 and 59 at a 20 % level of intake (468). With adult rats Mitchell & Beadles (469) obtained a value of 96 for true digestibility but the low biological value of 51, due in their opinion to a relative deficiency of casein in cystine and methionine and to the high requirement of the adult rat for them.…”
Section: (Iv) Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological values and true digestibilities recorded for casein by the balance-sheet method are 66 and 99 (465), 80 and 101(466), 79 and 84(467) and 72 (biological value) (426), all with growing rats at an 8-10 % level of protein intake, and biological values of 63 and 59 at a 20 % level of intake (468). With adult rats Mitchell & Beadles (469) obtained a value of 96 for true digestibility but the low biological value of 51, due in their opinion to a relative deficiency of casein in cystine and methionine and to the high requirement of the adult rat for them.…”
Section: (Iv) Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the present time the nutritive factor or factors responsible for the difference in protein efficiency of different samples of peas is not apparent. Other work in this laboratory ( 1,4) has shown that the efficiency of different samples of peas is somewhat variable.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Woods et al (8) and Peterson et ai. ( 4) have shown that methionine is the limit.ing amino acid in peas. • Sheldon et al (5) reported differences in the amino acid content of alfalfa resulting from different soil treatments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%