The Bidirectional Causality between Country-Level Governance, Economic Growth and Sustainable Development: A Cross-Country Data Analysis

Abstract

Abstract:In the context of contemporary society, characterized by the information users' growing and differentiated needs, the way country-level governance and social responsibility contribute to the ensuring of sustainable economic development is a concern for all the actors of the economic sphere. The aim of this paper is to test the causal linkages between the quality of country-level governance, economic growth and a well-known indicator of economic sustainable development, for a large panel of world-wide countries for a period of 10 years (2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015). While there are some prior studies that have argued the bidirectional causality between good public governance and economic development, this study intends to provide a new focus on the relationship between country-level governance and economic growth, on one hand, and between country-level governance and adjusted net savings, as a selected indicator of economic sustainable development, on the other hand. Four hypotheses on the causal relationship between good governance, economic growth and sustainable development were tested by using Granger non-causality tests. Our findings resulting from Granger non-causality tests provide reasonable evidence of Granger causality from country-level governance to economic growth, but from economic growth to country-level governance, the causality is not confirmed. In what regards the relationship between country-level governance and adjusted net savings, the bidirectional Granger causality is not confirmed. The main implication of our study is that improving economic growth and sustainable development is a very challenging issue, and the impact of macro-level factors such as country-level governance should not be neglected.

The Impact of Corruption and Shadow Economy on the Economic and Sustainable Development. Do They “Sand the Wheels” or “Grease the Wheels”?

“…Economic development is measured with the Gross Domestic Product per capita (GDPpercap), a very used indicator measuring the level of development and prosperity of a country. Following various authors [23,39,40] which investigate the influence of corruption and shadow economy upon the economic development) we are going to use the per capita GDP of countries as a measure for their economic development. The indicator is annually provided by the World Bank [41].…”

Application of the Vector Measure Construction Method and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity Ideal Solution for the Analysis of the Dynamics of Changes in the Poverty Levels in the European Union Countries

“…The empirical and application qualities are also important. Sound empirical research, based on well-chosen methods of analysis, provides not only a good understanding of the nature and complexity of social and economic phenomena, but also of their results, which are typically used to guide policy-makers in their political and social activities [99]. This in turn should, from an economic point of view, lead to an increase in the effectiveness of spending funds on adequate public policies [100].…”

Assessing the Benefits of the Sustainability Reporting Practices in the Top Romanian Companies

“…The level of the company's transparency can be attributed to the recording of higher cash flows even after the implementation of an environmental performance control [23], correlating with company liquidity, declining bidding spreads, and a high Tobin's Q [38].…”