2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.12.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The bi-layer structure and the higher compactness of a passive film on nanocrystalline 304 stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that the atomic percentages of Cr and Cu in 316L SS and 316L-Cu SS at 0 s of etching time were lower than those in the inner layer of passive films. This was related to the bi-layer structure of passive film, where the outer layer was enriched in iron oxide and the inner layer was enriched in chromium oxide[38]. Lin et al observed the similar phenomenon for Cu-bearing SS (Fe-18Cr-8Ni-xCu) passivated in sulfuric acid solution[39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is worth noting that the atomic percentages of Cr and Cu in 316L SS and 316L-Cu SS at 0 s of etching time were lower than those in the inner layer of passive films. This was related to the bi-layer structure of passive film, where the outer layer was enriched in iron oxide and the inner layer was enriched in chromium oxide[38]. Lin et al observed the similar phenomenon for Cu-bearing SS (Fe-18Cr-8Ni-xCu) passivated in sulfuric acid solution[39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Prior to the electrochemical studies the electrode surface was polished with 3000 SiC sandpaper, cleaned with distilled water and acetone, and then dried in air. Before each measurement the electrode was polarized cathodically at − 1.0 V SCE for 5 min to remove the natural passive films on the surface [27]. The potentiodynamic polarization tests were carried out at 1.67 mV/s and the potential range from − 1.2 V SCE to 1.0 V SCE .…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason is that there are some limitations in PDM I which we use. Firstly, the passive film formed on stainless steel is bi-layer films (proved in Sections 3.4 and 3.5), (27) whereas it was supposed that the passive film is a single layer for calculating. Secondly, there are more defects in the film such as interstitials in addition to cation vacancies and oxygen vacancies.…”
Section: Diffusivity Of Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive slope indicates n-type semiconductor and is associated with the Fe-rich outer layer of the passive film formed on stainless steels where oxygen vacancies and cation interstitials are the major dopants 51 . The donor (N D ) density can be calculated from the linear part The point defect model (PDM) 53,54 can be used to draw some conclusions about the passive film on the AISI 409 stainless steels. As stated in the PDM, oxygen vacancies on the surface of the passive film can react with chloride ions.…”
Section: (5) (6)mentioning
confidence: 99%