1976
DOI: 10.1137/0507009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bessel Polynomials and the StudenttDistribution

Abstract: The quotient 2Fo(-n + 1, n;-;-1/2x) P,_,(x),,/'-x2Fo(-n,n+ 1;-;-1/2x)-P.(x) arose in connection with the problem of the infinite divisibility of the Student distribution. It is shown that P,_,(x)/P,(,,Ux) is completely monotonic in [0, oo) for n 4, 5 and 6. This implies that the Student distribution is infinitely divisible for 9, 11 and 13 degrees of freedom. We show that certain power sums of the zeros of the simple Bessel polynomials are zero. This is then used to show that for every n =0, 1, 2,. ., there ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From (4) one can easily see that, for ordinary Bessel polynomials, the sum S2k+l = 0 for ks 1 as was pointed out by Ismail and Kelker (1976). Notice from the same equation that the quantities s,/ n for n + c o and r = 1,2, .…”
Section: A)mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…From (4) one can easily see that, for ordinary Bessel polynomials, the sum S2k+l = 0 for ks 1 as was pointed out by Ismail and Kelker (1976). Notice from the same equation that the quantities s,/ n for n + c o and r = 1,2, .…”
Section: A)mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…(The right side in (11) tends to infinity as m → ∞, and the example A 1 m = (3 m −1)/2 m shows that the quantities m − A n m are indeed unbounded as m → ∞.) Thus (7) immediately follows from (6), |f m | ≤ 1, Proposition 1 and (11):…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To prove (8), put x = x n = √ n/(1 + √ n) in (7) and apply the Stirling formula n! = √ 2πn(n/e) n exp c n , 0 < c n < 1/(12n), and also the inequalities x n < 1, (1+1/ √ n) √ n < e, c n + √ n + n −1/2 < 0.3n (n ≥ 13) and e 1.3 /4 < 0.92:…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the definition of K v (z) see [13, p. 78] The Bessel polynomials y n (z,2) = y n (z) = 2 F 0 (-n, 1 + n; --) (3.4) are related to the 6 n {z) by /1\ (3.5) Here 6> 0 (z) = l, 0,(z) = z+l, 0 2 (z) = z 2 + 3z + 3, etc., (3.6) [6, p. 7]. As in [6, p. 76] we let jS, -= )3 jn denote the j-th zero of 6 n (z), 1 ^; ^ n. Then by formula (14) of [6, p. 95] (see also [9]) we have From (3.2) and the expansion of the right-hand side of (3.7) into a geometric series we find that applies to negative powers of the zeros).…”
Section: S> (21)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reduces to a multiple of the Riemann zeta function when v = ±\. The Bessel-theta functions corresponding to (1.3) arise in probability theory; see [10] and also [8,9,11]. John Hawkins [7] has established THEOREM 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%