1985
DOI: 10.1112/s0025579300010913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Singularities of bessel‐zeta functions and Hawkins' polynomials

Abstract: The asymptotic behaviour of a sequence of polynomials cm = cm(v) satisfying cm+2=12[(m+3)cm+1−∑k=0mcm−kck] is established. These polynomials occur in Hawkins' formula for the residues of a Bessel‐zeta function at its possible poles in the left half plane. The results imply that cm(v)/cm(0) converges uniformly to cos πV on compact sets. This in turn implies that, for v not a half odd integer, all but finitely many of the possible poles are actual poles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that Grosswald Using the method of Section 1, we can find a generating function for the Hawkins polynomial. We can get the same result by replacing x by 1/x in formula (2.9) of [8]. We have Throughout the rest of the paper we use the following notation -l), (3.6) ) After multiplying both sides of (3.4) by /"(*), we compare coefficients of which appears to be somewhat simpler than a similar formula in [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that Grosswald Using the method of Section 1, we can find a generating function for the Hawkins polynomial. We can get the same result by replacing x by 1/x in formula (2.9) of [8]. We have Throughout the rest of the paper we use the following notation -l), (3.6) ) After multiplying both sides of (3.4) by /"(*), we compare coefficients of which appears to be somewhat simpler than a similar formula in [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Stolarsky [8] proved that <) 1 (m=0,l,2,...), (1.3) where c m (v) is the Hawkins polynomial [4], [8]. Grosswald [3, p. 93] stated that "it would be very desirable to have simple explicit formulae" for a^ for arbitrary m. Stolarsky [8] pointed out that equation (1.3) "is perhaps an answer to this question, but the c m (v) are themselves a bit mysterious".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More precisely, and for completeness, we can state the following results. Notice that the contribution of the non-homogeneity term q~ is shared equally among all the poles; in other words, the homogeneous Bessel zeta function has the same poles, but with (possibly) different residua (see [21]).…”
Section: Ria Vql)=~-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was thus dubbed the Bessel zeta function in Ref. [21,22], it is also known as the Raleigh function [23], for even integers s = 2, 4, 6, . .…”
Section: Twist Field As Aharonov-bohm Vortexmentioning
confidence: 99%